@article {2136, title = {Overlap and refractory effects in a brain-computer interface speller based on the visual P300 event-related potential.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {6}, year = {2009}, month = {04/2009}, pages = {026003}, abstract = {

We reveal the presence of refractory and overlap effects in the event-related potentials in visual P300 speller datasets, and we show their negative impact on the performance of the system. This finding has important implications for how to encode the letters that can be selected for communication. However, we show that such effects are dependent on stimulus parameters: an alternative stimulus type based on apparent motion suffers less from the refractory effects and leads to an improved letter prediction performance.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Brain, Cognition, Computer Simulation, Electroencephalography, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Humans, Models, Neurological, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Photic Stimulation, Semantics, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Task Performance and Analysis, User-Computer Interface, Writing}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/6/2/026003}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19255462}, author = {Martens, S M M and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Farquhar, Jason and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B} } @article {2143, title = {Classifying EEG and ECoG signals without subject training for fast BCI implementation: comparison of nonparalyzed and completely paralyzed subjects.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {183-6}, abstract = {

We summarize results from a series of related studies that aim to develop a motor-imagery-basedbrain-computer interface\ using a single recording session of electroencephalogram (EEG) or electrocorticogram (ECoG) signals for each subject. We apply the same experimental and analytical methods to 11 nonparalysed subjects (eight EEG, three ECoG), and to five paralyzed subjects (four EEG, one ECoG) who had been unable to communicate for some time. While it was relatively easy to obtain classifiable signals quickly from most of the nonparalyzed subjects, it proved impossible to classify the signals obtained from the paralyzed patients by the same methods. This highlights the fact that though certain BCI paradigms may work well with healthy subjects, this does not necessarily indicate success with the target user group. We outline possible reasons for this failure to transfer.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Cluster Analysis, Computer User Training, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Paralysis, Pattern Recognition, Automated, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875548}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792289}, author = {Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Lal, T.N and Schr{\"o}der, Michael and Hinterberger, T. and Wilhelm, Barbara and Nijboer, F and Mochty, Ursula and Widman, Guido and Elger, Christian and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B and K{\"u}bler, A. and Niels Birbaumer} }