@article {2131, title = {Transition from the locked in to the completely locked-in state: a physiological analysis.}, journal = {Clin Neurophysiol}, volume = {122}, year = {2011}, month = {06/2011}, pages = {925-33}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE:\ 

To clarify the physiological and behavioral boundaries between locked-in (LIS) and the completely locked-in state (CLIS) (no voluntary eye movements, no communication possible) through electrophysiological data and to secure\ brain-computer-interface\ (BCI) communication.

METHODS:\ 

Electromyography from facial muscles, external anal sphincter (EAS), electrooculography and electrocorticographic data during different psychophysiological tests were acquired to define electrophysiological differences in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patient with an intracranially implanted grid of 112 electrodes for nine months while the patient passed from the LIS to the CLIS.

RESULTS:\ 

At the very end of the LIS there was no facial muscle activity, nor external anal sphincter but eye control. Eye movements were slow and lasted for short periods only. During CLIS event related\ brainpotentials (ERP) to passive limb movements and auditory stimuli were recorded, vibrotactile stimulation of different body parts resulted in no ERP response.

CONCLUSIONS:\ 

The results presented contradict the commonly accepted assumption that the EAS is the last remaining muscle under voluntary control and demonstrate complete loss of eye movements in CLIS. The eye muscle was shown to be the last muscle group under voluntary control. The findings suggest ALS as a multisystem disorder, even affecting afferent sensory pathways.

SIGNIFICANCE:\ 

Auditory and proprioceptive\ brain-computer-interface\ (BCI) systems are the only remaining communication channels in CLIS.

}, keywords = {Adult, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Area Under Curve, Brain, Communication Aids for Disabled, Disease Progression, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Humans, Male, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1872-8952}, doi = {10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.019}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20888292}, author = {Murguialday, A Ramos and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Bensch, M and Martens, S M M and S Halder and Nijboer, F and Schoelkopf, Bernhard and Niels Birbaumer and Gharabaghi, A} } @article {2137, title = {Voluntary brain regulation and communication with electrocorticogram signals.}, journal = {Epilepsy Behav}, volume = {13}, year = {2008}, month = {08/2008}, pages = {300-6}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs) can be used for communication in writing without muscular activity or for learning to control seizures by voluntary regulation of\ brain\ signals such as the electroencephalogram (EEG). Three of five patients with epilepsy were able to spell their names with electrocorticogram (ECoG) signals derived from motor-related areas within only one or two training sessions. Imagery of finger or tongue movements was classified with support-vector classification of autoregressive coefficients derived from the ECoG signals. After training of the classifier, binary classification responses were used to select letters from a\ computer-generated menu. Offline analysis showed increased theta activity in the unsuccessful patients, whereas the successful patients exhibited dominant sensorimotor rhythms that they could control. The high spatial resolution and increased signal-to-noise ratio in ECoG signals, combined with short training periods, may offer an alternative for communication in complete paralysis, locked-in syndrome, and motor restoration.

}, keywords = {Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Cerebral Cortex, Communication Aids for Disabled, Dominance, Cerebral, Electroencephalography, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Motor Cortex, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software, Somatosensory Cortex, Theta Rhythm, User-Computer Interface, Writing}, issn = {1525-5069}, doi = {10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.03.014}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495541}, author = {Hinterberger, T. and Widman, Guido and Lal, T.N and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Tangermann, Michael and Rosenstiel, W. and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B and Elger, Christian and Niels Birbaumer} } @article {2181, title = {An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI).}, journal = {Neuroimage}, volume = {36}, year = {2007}, month = {07/2007}, pages = {581-93}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) allow for communicating intentions by mere brain activity, not involving muscles. Thus, BCIs may offer patients who have lost all voluntary muscle control the only possible way to communicate. Many recent studies have demonstrated that BCIs based on\ electroencephalography(EEG) can allow healthy and severely paralyzed individuals to communicate. While this approach is safe and inexpensive, communication is slow. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides signals with higher spatiotemporal resolution than\ EEG\ and could thus be used to explore whether these improved signal properties translate into increased BCI communication speed. In this study, we investigated the utility of an MEG-based BCI that uses voluntary amplitude modulation of sensorimotor mu and beta rhythms. To increase the signal-to-noise ratio, we present a simple spatial filtering method that takes the geometric properties of signal propagation in MEG into account, and we present methods that can process artifacts specifically encountered in an MEG-based BCI. Exemplarily, six participants were successfully trained to communicate binary decisions by imagery of limb movements using a feedback paradigm. Participants achieved significant mu rhythm self control within 32 min of feedback training. For a subgroup of three participants, we localized the origin of the amplitude modulated signal to the motor cortex. Our results suggest that an MEG-based BCI is feasible and efficient in terms of user training.

}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Artifacts, Brain, Electroencephalography, Electromagnetic Fields, Electromyography, Feedback, Female, Foot, Hand, Head Movements, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetoencephalography, Male, Movement, Principal Component Analysis, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1053-8119}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.019}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17475511}, author = {Mellinger, J{\"u}rgen and Gerwin Schalk and Christoph Braun and Preissl, Hubert and Rosenstiel, W. and Niels Birbaumer and K{\"u}bler, A.} } @article {2167, title = {The BCI Competition 2003: Progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Biomed Eng}, volume = {51}, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {1044-51}, abstract = {Interest in developing a new method of man-to-machine communication--a brain-computer interface (BCI)--has grown steadily over the past few decades. BCIs create a new communication channel between the brain and an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. These systems use signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications including simple word-processing software and orthotics. BCI technology could therefore provide a new communication and control option for individuals who cannot otherwise express their wishes to the outside world. Signal processing and classification methods are essential tools in the development of improved BCI technology. We organized the BCI Competition 2003 to evaluate the current state of the art of these tools. Four laboratories well versed in EEG-based BCI research provided six data sets in a documented format. We made these data sets (i.e., labeled training sets and unlabeled test sets) and their descriptions available on the Internet. The goal in the competition was to maximize the performance measure for the test labels. Researchers worldwide tested their algorithms and competed for the best classification results. This paper describes the six data sets and the results and function of the most successful algorithms.}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Cognition, Databases, Factual, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0018-9294}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2004.826692}, author = {Benjamin Blankertz and M{\"u}ller, Klaus-Robert and Curio, Gabriel and Theresa M Vaughan and Gerwin Schalk and Jonathan Wolpaw and Schl{\"o}gl, Alois and Neuper, Christa and Pfurtscheller, Gert and Hinterberger, T. and Schr{\"o}der, Michael and Niels Birbaumer} }