@article {4343, title = {Potential differences between monolingual and bilingual patients in approach and outcome after awake brain surgery.}, journal = {J Neurooncol}, volume = {148}, year = {2020}, month = {07/2020}, pages = {587-598}, abstract = {

INTRODUCTION: 20.8\% of the United States population and 67\% of the European population speak two or more languages. Intraoperative different languages, mapping, and localization are crucial. This investigation aims to address three questions between BL and ML patients: (1) Are there differences in complications (i.e. seizures) and DECS techniques during intra-operative brain mapping? (2) Is EOR different? and (3) Are there differences in the recovery pattern post-surgery?

METHODS: Data from 56 patients that underwent left-sided awake craniotomy for tumors infiltrating possible dominant hemisphere language areas from September 2016 to June 2019 were identified and analyzed in this study; 14 BL and 42 ML control patients. Patient demographics, education level, and the age of language acquisition were documented and evaluated. fMRI was performed on all participants.

RESULTS: 0 (0\%) BL and 3 (7\%) ML experienced intraoperative seizures (P = 0.73). BL patients received a higher direct DECS current in comparison to the ML patients (average = 4.7, 3.8, respectively, P = 0.03). The extent of resection was higher in ML patients in comparison to the BL patients (80.9 vs. 64.8, respectively, P = 0.04). The post-operative KPS scores were higher in BL patients in comparison to ML patients (84.3, 77.4, respectively, P = 0.03). BL showed lower drop in post-operative KPS in comparison to ML patients (- 4.3, - 8.7, respectively, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION: We show that BL patients have a lower incidence of intra-operative seizures, lower EOR, higher post-operative KPS and tolerate higher DECS current, in comparison to ML patients.

}, keywords = {Brain Mapping, Brain Neoplasms, Craniotomy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glioma, Humans, Incidence, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Seizures, United States, Wakefulness}, issn = {1573-7373}, doi = {10.1007/s11060-020-03554-0}, author = {ReFaey, Karim and Tripathi, Shashwat and Bhargav, Adip G and Grewal, Sanjeet S and Middlebrooks, Erik H and Sabsevitz, David S and Jentoft, Mark and Peter Brunner and Wu, Adela and Tatum, William O and Ritaccio, Anthony and Chaichana, Kaisorn L and Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo} } @article {2197, title = {Passive real-time identification of speech and motor cortex during an awake craniotomy.}, journal = {Epilepsy Behav}, volume = {18}, year = {2010}, month = {05/2010}, pages = {123-8}, abstract = {

Precise localization of eloquent cortex is a clinical necessity prior to surgical resections adjacent to speech or\ motor\ cortex. In the intraoperative setting, this traditionally requires inducing temporary lesions by direct electrocortical stimulation (DECS). In an attempt to increase efficiency and potentially reduce the amount of necessary stimulation, we used a passive mapping procedure in the setting of an awake craniotomy for tumor in two patients resection. We recorded electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals from exposed cortex while patients performed simple cue-directed\ motor\ and speech tasks. SIGFRIED, a procedure for real-time event detection, was used to identify areas of\ cortical\ activation by detecting task-related modulations in the ECoG high gamma band. SIGFRIED{\textquoteright}s real-time output quickly localized\ motor\ and speech areas of cortex similar to those identified by DECS. In conclusion, real-time passive identification of\ cortical\ function using SIGFRIED may serve as a useful adjunct to\ cortical\ stimulation mapping in the intraoperative setting.

}, keywords = {Brain Mapping, Brain Neoplasms, Cerebral Cortex, Craniotomy, Electric Stimulation, Electroencephalography, Humans, Neurologic Examination}, issn = {1525-5069}, doi = {10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.02.017}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20478745}, author = {Roland, Jarod and Peter Brunner and Johnston, James and Gerwin Schalk and Leuthardt, E C} }