@article {3386, title = {A practical, intuitive brain-computer interface for communicating {\textquoteright}yes{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteright}no{\textquoteright} by listening.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {11}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, pages = {035003}, abstract = {OBJECTIVE: Previous work has shown that it is possible to build an EEG-based binary brain-computer interface system (BCI) driven purely by shifts of attention to auditory stimuli. However, previous studies used abrupt, abstract stimuli that are often perceived as harsh and unpleasant, and whose lack of inherent meaning may make the interface unintuitive and difficult for beginners. We aimed to establish whether we could transition to a system based on more natural, intuitive stimuli (spoken words {\textquoteright}yes{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteright}no{\textquoteright}) without loss of performance, and whether the system could be used by people in the locked-in state. APPROACH: We performed a counterbalanced, interleaved within-subject comparison between an auditory streaming BCI that used beep stimuli, and one that used word stimuli. Fourteen healthy volunteers performed two sessions each, on separate days. We also collected preliminary data from two subjects with advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), who used the word-based system to answer a set of simple yes-no questions. MAIN RESULTS: The N1, N2 and P3 event-related potentials elicited by words varied more between subjects than those elicited by beeps. However, the difference between responses to attended and unattended stimuli was more consistent with words than beeps. Healthy subjects{\textquoteright} performance with word stimuli (mean 77\% {\textpm} 3.3 s.e.) was slightly but not significantly better than their performance with beep stimuli (mean 73\% {\textpm} 2.8 s.e.). The two subjects with ALS used the word-based BCI to answer questions with a level of accuracy similar to that of the healthy subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Since performance using word stimuli was at least as good as performance using beeps, we recommend that auditory streaming BCI systems be built with word stimuli to make the system more pleasant and intuitive. Our preliminary data show that word-based streaming BCI is a promising tool for communication by people who are locked in.}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Auditory Perception, brain-computer interfaces, Communication Aids for Disabled, Electroencephalography, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Middle Aged, Quadriplegia, Treatment Outcome, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/035003}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24838278}, author = {Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Ricci, Erin and Haider, Sameah and McCane, Lynn M and Susan M Heckman and Jonathan Wolpaw and Theresa M Vaughan} } @article {3087, title = {Brain-computer interfaces in medicine.}, journal = {Mayo Clinic proceedings. Mayo Clinic}, volume = {87}, year = {2012}, month = {03/2012}, pages = {268{\textendash}279}, abstract = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) acquire brain signals, analyze them, and translate them into commands that are relayed to output devices that carry out desired actions. BCIs do not use normal neuromuscular output pathways. The main goal of BCI is to replace or restore useful function to people disabled by neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, or spinal cord injury. From initial demonstrations of electroencephalography-based spelling and single-neuron-based device control, researchers have gone on to use electroencephalographic, intracortical, electrocorticographic, and other brain signals for increasingly complex control of cursors, robotic arms, prostheses, wheelchairs, and other devices. Brain-computer interfaces may also prove useful for rehabilitation after stroke and for other disorders. In the future, they might augment the performance of surgeons or other medical professionals. Brain-computer interface technology is the focus of a rapidly growing research and development enterprise that is greatly exciting scientists, engineers, clinicians, and the public in general. Its future achievements will depend on advances in 3 crucial areas. Brain-computer interfaces need signal-acquisition hardware that is convenient, portable, safe, and able to function in all environments. Brain-computer interface systems need to be validated in long-term studies of real-world use by people with severe disabilities, and effective and viable models for their widespread dissemination must be implemented. Finally, the day-to-day and moment-to-moment reliability of BCI performance must be improved so that it approaches the reliability of natural muscle-based function.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1942-5546}, doi = {10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22325364}, author = {Shih, Jerry J. and Krusienski, Dean J. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3086, title = {EEG correlates of P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {9}, year = {2012}, month = {04/2012}, pages = {026014}, abstract = {The purpose of this study was to identify electroencephalography (EEG) features that correlate with P300-based brain-computer interface (P300 BCI) performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Twenty people with ALS used a P300 BCI spelling application in copy-spelling mode. Three types of EEG features were found to be good predictors of P300 BCI performance: (1) the root-mean-square amplitude and (2) the negative peak amplitude of the event-related potential to target stimuli (target ERP) at Fz, Cz, P3, Pz, and P4; and (3) EEG theta frequency (4.5-8 Hz) power at Fz, Cz, P3, Pz, P4, PO7, PO8 and Oz. A statistical prediction model that used a subset of these features accounted for \>60\% of the variance in copy-spelling performance (p \< 0.001, mean R(2)?= 0.6175). The correlations reflected between-subject, rather than within-subject, effects. The results enhance understanding of performance differences among P300 BCI users. The predictors found in this study might help in: (1) identifying suitable candidates for long-term P300 BCI operation; (2) assessing performance online. Further work on within-subject effects needs to be done to establish whether P300 BCI user performance could be improved by optimizing one or more of these EEG features.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/9/2/026014}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22350501}, author = {Mak, Joseph N. and Dennis J. McFarland and Theresa M Vaughan and McCane, Lynn M. and Tsui, Phillippa Z. and Zeitlin, Debra J. and Sellers, Eric W. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3399, title = {Value of amplitude, phase, and coherence features for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Brain Res Bull}, volume = {87}, year = {2012}, month = {01/2012}, pages = {130-4}, abstract = {Measures that quantify the relationship between two or more brain signals are drawing attention as neuroscientists explore the mechanisms of large-scale integration that enable coherent behavior and cognition. Traditional Fourier-based measures of coherence have been used to quantify frequency-dependent relationships between two signals. More recently, several off-line studies examined phase-locking value (PLV) as a possible feature for use in brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. However, only a few individuals have been studied and full statistical comparisons among the different classes of features and their combinations have not been conducted. The present study examines the relative BCI performance of spectral power, coherence, and PLV, alone and in combination. The results indicate that spectral power produced classification at least as good as PLV, coherence, or any possible combination of these measures. This may be due to the fact that all three measures reflect mainly the activity of a single signal source (i.e., an area of sensorimotor cortex). This possibility is supported by the finding that EEG signals from different channels generally had near-zero phase differences. Coherence, PLV, and other measures of inter-channel relationships may be more valuable for BCIs that use signals from more than one distinct cortical source.}, keywords = {Algorithms, Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Motor Cortex, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1873-2747}, doi = {10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.09.019}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21985984}, author = {Krusienski, Dean J and Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3092, title = {Special issue containing contributions from the Fourth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {8}, year = {2011}, month = {04/2011}, pages = {020201}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/020201}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21436522}, author = {Theresa M Vaughan and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3101, title = {A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use.}, journal = {Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases}, volume = {11}, year = {2010}, month = {10/2010}, pages = {449{\textendash}455}, abstract = {Our objective was to develop and validate a new brain-computer interface (BCI) system suitable for long-term independent home use by people with severe motor disabilities. The BCI was used by a 51-year-old male with ALS who could no longer use conventional assistive devices. Caregivers learned to place the electrode cap, add electrode gel, and turn on the BCI. After calibration, the system allowed the user to communicate via EEG. Re-calibration was performed remotely (via the internet), and BCI accuracy assessed in periodic tests. Reports of BCI usefulness by the user and the family were also recorded. Results showed that BCI accuracy remained at 83\% (r = -.07, n.s.) for over 2.5 years (1.4\% expected by chance). The BCI user and his family state that the BCI had restored his independence in social interactions and at work. He uses the BCI to run his NIH-funded research laboratory and to communicate via e-mail with family, friends, and colleagues. In addition to this first user, several other similarly disabled people are now using the BCI in their daily lives. In conclusion, long-term independent home use of this BCI system is practical for severely disabled people, and can contribute significantly to quality of life and productivity.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1471-180X}, doi = {10.3109/17482961003777470}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20583947}, author = {Sellers, Eric W. and Theresa M Vaughan and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2200, title = {Does the {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} speller depend on eye gaze?.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {7}, year = {2010}, month = {10/2010}, pages = {056013}, abstract = {

Many people affected by debilitating neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem stroke or spinal cord injury are impaired in their ability to, or are even unable to, communicate. A brain-computer interface (BCI) uses brain signals, rather than muscles, to re-establish communication with the outside world. One particular BCI approach is the so-called {\textquoteright}P300 matrix speller{\textquoteright} that was first described by Farwell and Donchin (1988 Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 510-23). It has been widely assumed that this method does not depend on the ability to focus on the desired character, because it was thought that it relies primarily on the P300-evoked potential and minimally, if at all, on other EEG features such as the visual-evoked potential (VEP). This issue is highly relevant for the clinical application of this BCI method, because eye movements may be impaired or lost in the relevant user population. This study investigated the extent to which the performance in a {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} speller BCI depends on eye gaze. We evaluated the performance of 17 healthy subjects using a {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} matrix speller under two conditions. Under one condition ({\textquoteright}letter{\textquoteright}), the subjects focused their eye gaze on the intended letter, while under the second condition ({\textquoteright}center{\textquoteright}), the subjects focused their eye gaze on a fixation cross that was located in the center of the matrix. The results show that the performance of the {\textquoteright}P300{\textquoteright} matrix speller in normal subjects depends in considerable measure on gaze direction. They thereby disprove a widespread assumption in BCI research, and suggest that this BCI might function more effectively for people who retain some eye-movement control. The applicability of these findings to people with severe neuromuscular disabilities (particularly in eye-movements) remains to be determined.

}, keywords = {Adult, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Photic Stimulation, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/7/5/056013}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20858924}, author = {Peter Brunner and Joshi, S and S Briskin and Jonathan Wolpaw and H Bischof and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {3103, title = {Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {7}, year = {2010}, month = {06/2010}, pages = {036007}, abstract = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can use brain signals from the scalp (EEG), the cortical surface (ECoG), or within the cortex to restore movement control to people who are paralyzed. Like muscle-based skills, BCIs{\textquoteright} use requires activity-dependent adaptations in the brain that maintain stable relationships between the person{\textquoteright}s intent and the signals that convey it. This study shows that humans can learn over a series of training sessions to use EEG for three-dimensional control. The responsible EEG features are focused topographically on the scalp and spectrally in specific frequency bands. People acquire simultaneous control of three independent signals (one for each dimension) and reach targets in a virtual three-dimensional space. Such BCI control in humans has not been reported previously. The results suggest that with further development noninvasive EEG-based BCIs might control the complex movements of robotic arms or neuroprostheses.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/7/3/036007}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20460690}, author = {Dennis J. McFarland and Sarnacki, William A. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3107, title = {Brain-computer interface research at the wadsworth center developments in noninvasive communication and control.}, journal = {International review of neurobiology}, volume = {86}, year = {2009}, month = {02/2009}, pages = {147{\textendash}157}, abstract = {Brain-computer interface (BCI) research at the Wadsworth Center focuses on noninvasive, electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCI methods for helping severely disabled individuals communicate and interact with their environment. We have demonstrated that these individuals, as well as able-bodied individuals, can learn to use sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) to move a cursor rapidly and accurately in one and two dimensions. We have also developed a practical P300-based BCI that enables users to access and control the full functionality of their personal computer. We are currently translating this laboratory-proved BCI technology into a system that can be used by severely disabled individuals in their homes with minimal ongoing technical oversight. Our comprehensive approach to BCI design has led to several innovations that are applicable in other BCI contexts, such as space missions.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0074-7742}, doi = {10.1016/S0074-7742(09)86011-X}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19607997}, author = {Krusienski, Dean J. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2183, title = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs): Detection Instead of Classification.}, journal = {J Neurosci Methods}, volume = {167}, year = {2008}, month = {01/2008}, pages = {51-62}, abstract = {

Many studies over the past two decades have shown that people can use\ brain\ signals to convey their intent to a\ computer\ through\ brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs). These devices operate by recording signals from the\ brain\ and translating these signals into device commands. They can be used by people who are severely paralyzed to communicate without any use of muscle activity. One of the major impediments in translating this novel technology into\ clinical\ applications is the current requirement for preliminary analyses to identify the\ brain\ signal features best suited for communication. This paper introduces and validates signal detection, which does not require such analysis procedures, as a new concept in BCI signal processing. This detection concept is realized with Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) that are used to model resting\ brain\ activity so that any change in\ relevantbrain\ signals can be detected. It is implemented in a package called SIGFRIED (SIGnal modeling For Real-time Identification and Event Detection). The results indicate that SIGFRIED produces results that are within the range of those achieved using a common analysis strategy that requires preliminary identification of signal features. They indicate that such laborious analysis procedures could be replaced by merely recording\ brain\ signals during rest. In summary, this paper demonstrates how SIGFRIED could be used to overcome one of the present impediments to translation of laboratory BCI demonstrations into clinically practical applications.

}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Normal Distribution, Online Systems, Signal Detection, Psychological, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software Validation, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0165-0270}, doi = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.010}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17920134}, author = {Gerwin Schalk and Peter Brunner and Lester A Gerhardt and H Bischof and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3112, title = {Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation.}, journal = {Lancet neurology}, volume = {7}, year = {2008}, month = {11/2008}, pages = {1032{\textendash}1043}, abstract = {Recent advances in analysis of brain signals, training patients to control these signals, and improved computing capabilities have enabled people with severe motor disabilities to use their brain signals for communication and control of objects in their environment, thereby bypassing their impaired neuromuscular system. Non-invasive, electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies can be used to control a computer cursor or a limb orthosis, for word processing and accessing the internet, and for other functions such as environmental control or entertainment. By re-establishing some independence, BCI technologies can substantially improve the lives of people with devastating neurological disorders such as advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. BCI technology might also restore more effective motor control to people after stroke or other traumatic brain disorders by helping to guide activity-dependent brain plasticity by use of EEG brain signals to indicate to the patient the current state of brain activity and to enable the user to subsequently lower abnormal activity. Alternatively, by use of brain signals to supplement impaired muscle control, BCIs might increase the efficacy of a rehabilitation protocol and thus improve muscle control for the patient.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1474-4422}, doi = {10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70223-0}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18835541}, author = {Janis J. Daly and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3131, title = {Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {5}, year = {2008}, month = {06/2008}, pages = {101{\textendash}110}, abstract = {Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can provide nonmuscular communication and control to people who are severely paralyzed. BCIs can use noninvasive or invasive techniques for recording the brain signals that convey the user{\textquoteright}s commands. Although noninvasive BCIs are used for simple applications, it has frequently been assumed that only invasive BCIs, which use electrodes implanted in the brain, will be able to provide multidimensional sequential control of a robotic arm or a neuroprosthesis. The present study shows that a noninvasive BCI using scalp-recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and an adaptive algorithm can provide people, including people with spinal cord injuries, with two-dimensional cursor movement and target selection. Multiple targets were presented around the periphery of a computer screen, with one designated as the correct target. The user{\textquoteright}s task was to use EEG to move a cursor from the center of the screen to the correct target and then to use an additional EEG feature to select the target. If the cursor reached an incorrect target, the user was instructed not to select it. Thus, this task emulated the key features of mouse operation. The results indicate that people with severe motor disabilities could use brain signals for sequential multidimensional movement and selection.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/001}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18367779}, author = {Dennis J. McFarland and Krusienski, Dean J. and Sarnacki, William A. and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3129, title = {Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface (BCI): model order selection for autoregressive spectral analysis.}, journal = {Journal of neural engineering}, volume = {5}, year = {2008}, month = {06/2008}, pages = {155{\textendash}162}, abstract = {People can learn to control EEG features consisting of sensorimotor rhythm amplitudes and can use this control to move a cursor in one or two dimensions to a target on a screen. Cursor movement depends on the estimate of the amplitudes of sensorimotor rhythms. Autoregressive models are often used to provide these estimates. The order of the autoregressive model has varied widely among studies. Through analyses of both simulated and actual EEG data, the present study examines the effects of model order on sensorimotor rhythm measurements and BCI performance. The results show that resolution of lower frequency signals requires higher model orders and that this requirement reflects the temporal span of the model coefficients. This is true for both simulated EEG data and actual EEG data during brain-computer interface (BCI) operation. Increasing model order, and decimating the signal were similarly effective in increasing spectral resolution. Furthermore, for BCI control of two-dimensional cursor movement, higher model orders produced better performance in each dimension and greater independence between horizontal and vertical movements. In sum, these results show that autoregressive model order selection is an important determinant of BCI performance and should be based on criteria that reflect system performance.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/006}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18430974}, author = {Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2184, title = {Towards an independent brain-computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials.}, journal = {Clin Neurophysiol}, volume = {119}, year = {2008}, month = {02/2008}, pages = {399-408}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE:\ 

Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems using steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) have allowed healthy subjects to communicate. However, these systems may not work in severely disabled users because they may depend on gaze shifting. This study evaluates the hypothesis that overlapping stimuli can evoke changes in SSVEP activity sufficient to control a BCI. This would provide evidence that SSVEP BCIs could be used without shifting gaze.

METHODS:\ 

Subjects viewed a display containing two images that each oscillated at a different frequency. Different conditions used overlapping or non-overlapping images to explore dependence on gaze function. Subjects were asked to direct attention to one or the other of these images during each of 12 one-minute runs.

RESULTS:\ 

Half of the subjects produced differences in SSVEP activity elicited by overlapping stimuli that could support BCI control. In all remaining users, differences did exist at corresponding frequencies but were not strong enough to allow effective control.

CONCLUSIONS:\ 

The\ data\ demonstrate that SSVEP differences sufficient for BCI control may be elicited by selective attention to one of two overlapping stimuli. Thus, some SSVEP-based BCI approaches may not depend on gaze control. The nature and extent of any BCI{\textquoteright}s dependence on muscle activity is a function of many factors, including the display, task, environment, and user.

SIGNIFICANCE:\ 

SSVEP BCIs might function in severely disabled users unable to reliably control gaze. Further research with these users is necessary to explore the optimal parameters of such a system and validate online performance in a home environment.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Spectrum Analysis, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1388-2457}, doi = {10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.121}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18077208}, author = {Brendan Z. Allison and Dennis J. McFarland and Gerwin Schalk and Zheng, Shi Dong and Moore-Jackson, Melody and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2186, title = {Two-dimensional movement control using electrocorticographic signals in humans.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {5}, year = {2008}, month = {03/2008}, pages = {75-84}, abstract = {

We show here that a\ brain-computer\ interface (BCI) using electrocorticographic activity (ECoG) and imagined or overt motor tasks enables humans to control a\ computer\ cursor in two dimensions. Over a brief training period of 12-36 min, each of five human subjects acquired substantial control of particular ECoG features recorded from several locations over the same hemisphere, and achieved average success rates of 53-73\% in a two-dimensional four-target center-out task in which chance accuracy was 25\%. Our results support the expectation that ECoG-based BCIs can combine high performance with technical and\ clinical\ practicality, and also indicate promising directions for further research.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Drug Resistance, Electrocardiography, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/5/1/008}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18310813}, author = {Gerwin Schalk and Miller, K.J. and Nicholas R Anderson and Adam J Wilson and Smyth, Matt and Ojemann, J G and Moran, D and Jonathan Wolpaw and Leuthardt, E C} } @article {3209, title = {Brain-computer interfaces as new brain output pathways.}, journal = {The Journal of physiology}, volume = {579}, year = {2007}, month = {03/2007}, pages = {613{\textendash}619}, abstract = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can provide non-muscular communication and control for people with severe motor disabilities. Current BCIs use a variety of invasive and non-invasive methods to record brain signals and a variety of signal processing methods. Whatever the recording and processing methods used, BCI performance (e.g. the ability of a BCI to control movement of a computer cursor) is highly variable and, by the standards applied to neuromuscular control, could be described as ataxic. In an effort to understand this imperfection, this paper discusses the relevance of two principles that underlie the brain{\textquoteright}s normal motor outputs. The first principle is that motor outputs are normally produced by the combined activity of many CNS areas, from the cortex to the spinal cord. Together, these areas produce appropriate control of the spinal motoneurons that activate muscles. The second principle is that the acquisition and life-long preservation of motor skills depends on continual adaptive plasticity throughout the CNS. This plasticity optimizes the control of spinal motoneurons. In the light of these two principles, a BCI may be viewed as a system that changes the outcome of CNS activity from control of spinal motoneurons to, instead, control of the cortical (or other) area whose signals are used by the BCI to determine the user{\textquoteright}s intent. In essence, a BCI attempts to assign to cortical neurons the role normally performed by spinal motoneurons. Thus, a BCI requires that the many CNS areas involved in producing normal motor actions change their roles so as to optimize the control of cortical neurons rather than spinal motoneurons. The disconcerting variability of BCI performance may stem in large part from the challenge presented by the need for this unnatural adaptation. This difficulty might be reduced, and BCI development might thereby benefit, by adopting a {\textquoteright}goal-selection{\textquoteright} rather than a {\textquoteright}process- control{\textquoteright} strategy. In {\textquoteright}process control{\textquoteright}, a BCI manages all the intricate high-speed interactions involved in movement. In {\textquoteright}goal selection{\textquoteright}, by contrast, the BCI simply communicates the user{\textquoteright}s goal to software that handles the high-speed interactions needed to achieve the goal. Not only is {\textquoteright}goal selection{\textquoteright} less demanding, but also, by delegating lower-level aspects of motor control to another structure (rather than requiring that the cortex do everything), it more closely resembles the distributed operation characteristic of normal motor control.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0022-3751}, doi = {10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125948}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17255164}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2174, title = {A {\textmu}-rhythm Matched Filter for Continuous Control of a Brain-Computer Interface.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Biomed Eng}, volume = {54}, year = {2007}, month = {02/2007}, pages = {273-80}, abstract = {

A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a system that provides an alternate nonmuscular communication/control channel for individuals with severe neuromuscular disabilities. With proper training, individuals can learn to modulate the amplitude of specific electroencephalographic (EEG) components (e.g., the 8-12 Hz mu rhythm and 18-26 Hz beta rhythm) over the sensorimotor cortex and use them to control a cursor on a computer screen. Conventional spectral techniques for monitoring the\ continuousamplitude fluctuations fail to capture essential amplitude/phase relationships of the mu and beta rhythms in a compact fashion and, therefore, are suboptimal. By extracting the characteristic mu rhythm for a user, the exact morphology can be characterized and exploited as a matched filter. A simple, parameterized model for the characteristic mu rhythm is proposed and its effectiveness as a matched filter is examined online for a one-dimensional cursor control task. The results suggest that amplitude/phase coupling exists between the mu and beta bands during event-related desynchronization, and that an appropriate matched filter can provide improved performance.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Cerebral Cortex, Cortical Synchronization, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Imagination, Pattern Recognition, Automated, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0018-9294}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2006.886661}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17278584}, author = {Krusienski, Dean J and Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2172, title = {The BCI competition III: Validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {153-9}, abstract = {

A\ brain-computer interface\ (BCI) is a system that allows its users to control external devices with\ brainactivity. Although the proof-of-concept was given decades ago, the reliable translation of user intent into device control commands is still a major challenge. Success requires the effective interaction of two adaptive controllers: the user{\textquoteright}s\ brain, which produces\ brain\ activity that encodes intent, and the BCI system, which translates that activity into device control commands. In order to facilitate this interaction, many laboratories are exploring a variety of signal analysis techniques to improve the adaptation of the BCI system to the user. In the literature, many machine learning and pattern classification algorithms have been reported to give impressive results when applied to BCI data in offline analyses. However, it is more difficult to evaluate their relative value for actual\ online\ use. BCI data competitions have been organized to provide objective formal evaluations of alternative methods. Prompted by the great interest in the first two BCI Competitions, we organized the third BCI Competition to address several of the most difficult and important analysis problems in BCI research. The paper describes the data sets that were provided to the competitors and gives an overview of the results.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Brain, Communication Aids for Disabled, Databases, Factual, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, Software Validation, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875642}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792282}, author = {Benjamin Blankertz and M{\"u}ller, Klaus-Robert and Krusienski, Dean J and Gerwin Schalk and Jonathan Wolpaw and Schl{\"o}gl, Alois and Pfurtscheller, Gert and Mill{\'a}n, Jos{\'e} del R and Schr{\"o}der, Michael and Niels Birbaumer} } @article {3202, title = {An evaluation of autoregressive spectral estimation model order for brain-computer interface applications.}, journal = {Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference}, volume = {1}, year = {2006}, month = {09/2006}, pages = {1323{\textendash}1326}, abstract = {Autoregressive (AR) spectral estimation is a popular method for modeling the electroencephalogram (EEG), and therefore the frequency domain EEG phenomena that are used for control of a brain-computer interface (BCI). Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the optimal AR model order for EEG, but the criteria used in these studies does not necessarily equate to the optimal AR model order for sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)-based BCI control applications. The present study confirms this by evaluating the EEG spectra of data obtained during control of SMR-BCI using different AR model orders and model evaluation criteria. The results indicate that the AR model order that optimizes SMR-BCI control performance is generally higher than the model orders that are frequently used in SMR-BCI studies.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1557-170X}, doi = {10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259822}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17946038}, author = {Krusienski, D. J. and Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3217, title = {The Third International Meeting on Brain-Computer Interface Technology: making a difference.}, journal = {IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {126{\textendash}127}, abstract = {This special issue of the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING provides a representative and comprehensive bird{\textquoteright}s-eye view of the most recent developments in brain-computer interface (BCI) technology from laboratories around the world. The 30 research communications and papers are the direct outcome of the Third International Meeting on Brain-Computer Interface Technology held at the Rensselaerville Institute, Rensselaerville, NY, in June 2005. Fifty-three research groups from North and South America, Europe, and Asia, representing the majority of all the existing BCI laboratories around the world, participated in this highly focused meeting sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and organized by the BCI Laboratory of the Wadsworth Center of the New York State Department of Health. As demonstrated by the papers in this special issue, the rapid advances in BCI research and development make this technology capable of providing communication and control to people severely disabled by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), brainstem stroke, cerebral palsy, and other neuromuscular disorders. Future work is expected to improve the performance and utility of BCIs, and to focus increasingly on making them a viable, practical, and affordable communication alternative for many thousands of severely disabled people worldwide.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875649}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792275}, author = {Theresa M Vaughan and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2177, title = {The Wadsworth BCI Research and Development Program: At Home with BCI.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {14}, year = {2006}, month = {06/2006}, pages = {229-33}, abstract = {

The ultimate goal of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology is to provide communication and control capacities to people with severe motor disabilities. BCI research at the Wadsworth Center focuses primarily on noninvasive,\ electroencephalography\ (EEG)-based BCI methods. We have shown that people, including those with severe motor disabilities, can learn to use sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) to move a cursor rapidly and accurately in one or two dimensions. We have also improved P300-based BCI operation. We are now translating this laboratory-proven BCI technology into a system that can be used by severely disabled people in their homes with minimal ongoing technical oversight. To accomplish this, we have: improved our general-purpose BCI software (BCI2000); improved online adaptation and feature translation for SMR-based BCI operation; improved the accuracy and bandwidth of P300-based BCI operation; reduced the\ complexity\ of system hardware and software and begun to evaluate home system use in appropriate users. These developments have resulted in prototype systems for every day use in people{\textquoteright}s homes.

}, keywords = {Animals, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, New York, Research, Switzerland, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Universities, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875577}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792301}, author = {Theresa M Vaughan and Dennis J. McFarland and Gerwin Schalk and Sarnacki, William A and Krusienski, Dean J and Sellers, Eric W and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2169, title = {Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Neurology}, volume = {64}, year = {2005}, month = {05/2005}, pages = {1775-7}, abstract = {

People with severe motor disabilities can maintain an acceptable quality of life if they can communicate.\ Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs), which do not depend on muscle control, can provide communication. Four people severely disabled by ALS learned to operate a BCI with EEG rhythms recorded over sensorimotor cortex. These results suggest that a sensorimotor rhythm-based\ BCI could help maintain quality of life for people with ALS.

}, keywords = {Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Movement, Paralysis, Photic Stimulation, Prostheses and Implants, Somatosensory Cortex, Treatment Outcome, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1526-632X}, doi = {10.1212/01.WNL.0000158616.43002.6D}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911809}, author = {K{\"u}bler, A. and Nijboer, F and Mellinger, J{\"u}rgen and Theresa M Vaughan and Pawelzik, H and Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Niels Birbaumer and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3220, title = {Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Neurology}, volume = {64}, year = {2005}, month = {05/2005}, pages = {1775{\textendash}1777}, abstract = {People with severe motor disabilities can maintain an acceptable quality of life if they can communicate. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which do not depend on muscle control, can provide communication. Four people severely disabled by ALS learned to operate a BCI with EEG rhythms recorded over sensorimotor cortex. These results suggest that a sensorimotor rhythm-based BCI could help maintain quality of life for people with ALS.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1526-632X}, doi = {10.1212/01.WNL.0000158616.43002.6D}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911809}, author = {K{\"u}bler, A. and Nijboer, F. and Mellinger, J. and Theresa M Vaughan and Pawelzik, H. and Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Niels Birbaumer and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2167, title = {The BCI Competition 2003: Progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Biomed Eng}, volume = {51}, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {1044-51}, abstract = {Interest in developing a new method of man-to-machine communication--a brain-computer interface (BCI)--has grown steadily over the past few decades. BCIs create a new communication channel between the brain and an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. These systems use signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications including simple word-processing software and orthotics. BCI technology could therefore provide a new communication and control option for individuals who cannot otherwise express their wishes to the outside world. Signal processing and classification methods are essential tools in the development of improved BCI technology. We organized the BCI Competition 2003 to evaluate the current state of the art of these tools. Four laboratories well versed in EEG-based BCI research provided six data sets in a documented format. We made these data sets (i.e., labeled training sets and unlabeled test sets) and their descriptions available on the Internet. The goal in the competition was to maximize the performance measure for the test labels. Researchers worldwide tested their algorithms and competed for the best classification results. This paper describes the six data sets and the results and function of the most successful algorithms.}, keywords = {Adult, Algorithms, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Cognition, Databases, Factual, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0018-9294}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2004.826692}, author = {Benjamin Blankertz and M{\"u}ller, Klaus-Robert and Curio, Gabriel and Theresa M Vaughan and Gerwin Schalk and Jonathan Wolpaw and Schl{\"o}gl, Alois and Neuper, Christa and Pfurtscheller, Gert and Hinterberger, T. and Schr{\"o}der, Michael and Niels Birbaumer} } @article {3223, title = {BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system.}, journal = {IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering}, volume = {51}, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {1034{\textendash}1043}, abstract = {Many laboratories have begun to develop brain-computer interface (BCI) systems that provide communication and control capabilities to people with severe motor disabilities. Further progress and realization of practical applications depends on systematic evaluations and comparisons of different brain signals, recording methods, processing algorithms, output formats, and operating protocols. However, the typical BCI system is designed specifically for one particular BCI method and is, therefore, not suited to the systematic studies that are essential for continued progress. In response to this problem, we have developed a documented general-purpose BCI research and development platform called BCI2000. BCI2000 can incorporate alone or in combination any brain signals, signal processing methods, output devices, and operating protocols. This report is intended to describe to investigators, biomedical engineers, and computer scientists the concepts that the BC12000 system is based upon and gives examples of successful BCI implementations using this system. To date, we have used BCI2000 to create BCI systems for a variety of brain signals, processing methods, and applications. The data show that these systems function well in online operation and that BCI2000 satisfies the stringent real-time requirements of BCI systems. By substantially reducing labor and cost, BCI2000 facilitates the implementation of different BCI systems and other psychophysiological experiments. It is available with full documentation and free of charge for research or educational purposes and is currently being used in a variety of studies by many research groups.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0018-9294}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2004.827072}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15188875}, author = {Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Hinterberger, Thilo and Niels Birbaumer and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2166, title = {BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Biomed Eng}, volume = {51}, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {1034-43}, abstract = {Many laboratories have begun to develop brain-computer interface (BCI) systems that provide communication and control capabilities to people with severe motor disabilities. Further progress and realization of practical applications depends on systematic evaluations and comparisons of different brain signals, recording methods, processing algorithms, output formats, and operating protocols. However, the typical BCI system is designed specifically for one particular BCI method and is, therefore, not suited to the systematic studies that are essential for continued progress. In response to this problem, we have developed a documented general-purpose BCI research and development platform called BCI2000. BCI2000 can incorporate alone or in combination any brain signals, signal processing methods, output devices, and operating protocols. This report is intended to describe to investigators, biomedical engineers, and computer scientists the concepts that the BC12000 system is based upon and gives examples of successful BCI implementations using this system. To date, we have used BCI2000 to create BCI systems for a variety of brain signals, processing methods, and applications. The data show that these systems function well in online operation and that BCI2000 satisfies the stringent real-time requirements of BCI systems. By substantially reducing labor and cost, BCI2000 facilitates the implementation of different BCI systems and other psychophysiological experiments. It is available with full documentation and free of charge for research or educational purposes and is currently being used in a variety of studies by many research groups.}, keywords = {Algorithms, Brain, Cognition, Communication Aids for Disabled, Computer Peripherals, Electroencephalography, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Systems Integration, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0018-9294}, doi = {10.1109/TBME.2004.827072}, author = {Gerwin Schalk and Dennis J. McFarland and Hinterberger, T. and Niels Birbaumer and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {2168, title = {A brain-computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans.}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {1}, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {63-71}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs) enable users to control devices with electroencephalographic (EEG) activity from the scalp or with single-neuron activity from within the\ brain. Both methods have disadvantages: EEG has limited resolution and requires extensive training, while single-neuron recording entails significant clinical risks and has limited stability. We demonstrate here for the first time that electrocorticographic (ECoG) activity recorded from the surface of the\ brain\ can enable users to control a one-dimensional\ computer\ cursor rapidly and accurately. We first identified ECoG signals that were associated with different types of motor and speech imagery. Over brief training periods of 3-24 min, four patients then used these signals to master closed-loop control and to achieve success rates of 74-100\% in a one-dimensional binary task. In additional open-loop experiments, we found that ECoG signals at frequencies up to 180 Hz encoded substantial information about the direction of two-dimensional joystick movements. Our results suggest that an ECoG-based BCI could provide for people with severe motor disabilities a non-muscular communication and control option that is more powerful than EEG-based BCIs and is potentially more stable and less traumatic than BCIs that use electrodes penetrating the\ brain.

}, keywords = {Adult, Brain, Communication Aids for Disabled, Computer Peripherals, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Movement Disorders, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2560}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/1/2/001}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15876624}, author = {Leuthardt, E C and Gerwin Schalk and Jonathan Wolpaw and Ojemann, J G and Moran, D} } @article {2165, title = {The Wadsworth Center brain-computer interface (BCI) research and development program.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng}, volume = {11}, year = {2003}, month = {06/2003}, pages = {204-7}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interface (BCI) research at the Wadsworth Center has focused primarily on using electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythms recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex to\ control\ cursor movement in one or two dimensions. Recent and current studies seek to improve the speed and accuracy of this\ control\ by improving the selection of signal features and their translation into device commands, by incorporating additional signal features, and by optimizing the adaptive interaction between the user and system. In addition, to facilitate the evaluation, comparison, and combination of alternative BCI methods, we have developed a general-purpose BCI system called BCI-2000 and have made it available to other research\ groups. Finally, in collaboration with several other\ groups, we are developing simple BCI applications and are testing their practicality and long-term value for people with severe motor disabilities.

}, keywords = {Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Algorithms, Artifacts, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Feedback, Humans, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Research, Research Design, User-Computer Interface, Visual Perception}, issn = {1534-4320}, doi = {10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814442}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12899275}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw and Dennis J. McFarland and Theresa M Vaughan and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2268, title = {Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.}, journal = {Clin Neurophysiol}, volume = {113}, year = {2002}, month = {06/2002}, pages = {767-91}, abstract = {

For many years people have speculated that electroencephalographic activity or other electrophysiological measures of brain function might provide a new non-muscular channel for sending messages and commands to the external world - a brain-computer interface (BCI). Over the past 15 years, productive BCI research programs have arisen. Encouraged by new understanding of brain function, by the advent of powerful low-cost computer equipment, and by growing recognition of the needs and potentials of people with disabilities, these programs concentrate on developing new augmentative communication and\ controltechnology for those with severe neuromuscular disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem stroke, and spinal cord injury. The immediate goal is to provide these users, who may be completely paralyzed, or {\textquoteright}locked in{\textquoteright}, with basic communication capabilities so that they can express their wishes to caregivers or even operate word processing programs or neuroprostheses. Present-day BCIs determine the intent of the user from a variety of different electrophysiological signals. These signals include slow cortical potentials, P300 potentials, and mu or beta rhythms recorded from the scalp, and cortical neuronal activity recorded by implanted electrodes. They are translated in real-time into commands that operate a computer display or other device. Successful operation requires that the user encode commands in these signals and that the BCI derive the commands from the signals. Thus, the user and the BCI system need to adapt to each other both initially and continually so as to ensure stable performance. Current BCIs have maximum information transfer rates up to 10-25bits/min. This limited capacity can be valuable for people whose severe disabilities prevent them from using conventional augmentative communication methods. At the same time, many possible applications of BCI technology, such as neuroprosthesis\ control, may require higher information transfer rates. Future progress will depend on: recognition that BCI research and development is an interdisciplinary problem, involving neurobiology, psychology, engineering, mathematics, and computer science; identification of those signals, whether evoked potentials, spontaneous rhythms, or neuronal firing rates, that users are best able to\ control\ independent of activity in conventional motor output pathways; development of training methods for helping users to gain and maintain that\ control; delineation of the best algorithms for translating these signals into device commands; attention to the identification and elimination of artifacts such as electromyographic and electro-oculographic activity; adoption of precise and objective procedures for evaluating BCI performance; recognition of the need for long-term as well as short-term assessment of BCI performance; identification of appropriate BCI applications and appropriate matching of applications and users; and attention to factors that affect user acceptance of augmentative technology, including ease of use, cosmesis, and provision of those communication and\ control\ capacities that are most important to the user. Development of BCI technology will also benefit from greater emphasis on peer-reviewed research publications and avoidance of the hyperbolic and often misleading media attention that tends to generate unrealistic expectations in the public and skepticism in other researchers. With adequate recognition and effective engagement of all these issues, BCI systems could eventually provide an important new communication and\ control\ option for those with motor disabilities and might also give those without disabilities a supplementary\ control\ channel or a\ control\ channel useful in special circumstances.

}, keywords = {Brain Diseases, Communication Aids for Disabled, Computer Systems, Electroencephalography, Humans, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1388-2457}, doi = {10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12048038}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw and Niels Birbaumer and Dennis J. McFarland and Pfurtscheller, Gert and Theresa M Vaughan} } @article {3230, title = {Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in.}, journal = {Psychological bulletin}, volume = {127}, year = {2001}, month = {05/2001}, pages = {358{\textendash}375}, abstract = {With the increasing efficiency of life-support systems and better intensive care, more patients survive severe injuries of the brain and spinal cord. Many of these patients experience locked-in syndrome: The active mind is locked in a paralyzed body. Consequently, communication is extremely restricted or impossible. A muscle-independent communication channel overcomes this problem and is realized through a brain-computer interface, a direct connection between brain and computer. The number of technically elaborated brain-computer interfaces is in contrast with the number of systems used in the daily life of locked-in patients. It is hypothesized that a profound knowledge and consideration of psychological principles are necessary to make brain-computer interfaces feasible for locked-in patients.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0033-2909}, doi = {10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.358}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11393301}, author = {K{\"u}bler, A. and Kotchoubey, B. and Kaiser, J. and Jonathan Wolpaw and Niels Birbaumer} } @article {3235, title = {Brain-computer interface research at the Wadsworth Center.}, journal = {IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society}, volume = {8}, year = {2000}, month = {06/2000}, pages = {222{\textendash}226}, abstract = {Studies at the Wadsworth Center over the past 14 years have shown that people with or without motor disabilities can learn to control the amplitude of mu or beta rhythms in electroencephalographic (EEG) activity recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex and can use that control to move a cursor on a computer screen in one or two dimensions. This EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) could provide a new augmentative communication technology for those who are totally paralyzed or have other severe motor impairments. Present research focuses on improving the speed and accuracy of BCI communication.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1063-6528}, doi = {10.1109/86.847823}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10896194}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw and Dennis J. McFarland and Theresa M Vaughan} } @article {2163, title = {Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting.}, journal = {IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng}, volume = {8}, year = {2000}, month = {06/2000}, pages = {164-73}, abstract = {

Over the past decade, many laboratories have begun to explore brain-computer interface (BCI) technology as a radically new communication option for those with neuromuscular impairments that prevent them from using conventional augmentative communication methods. BCI{\textquoteright}s provide these users with communication channels that do not depend on peripheral nerves and muscles. This article summarizes the first international meeting devoted to BCI research and development. Current BCI{\textquoteright}s use electroencephalographic (EEG) activity recorded at the scalp or single-unit activity recorded from within cortex to control cursor movement, select letters or icons, or operate a neuroprosthesis. The central element in each BCI is a translation algorithm that converts electrophysiological input from the user into output that controls external devices. BCI operation depends on effective interaction between two adaptive controllers, the user who encodes his or her commands in the electrophysiological input provided to the BCI, and the BCI which recognizes the commands contained in the input and expresses them in device control. Current BCI{\textquoteright}s have maximum information transfer rates of 5-25 b/min. Achievement of greater speed and accuracy depends on improvements in signal processing, translation algorithms, and user training. These improvements depend on increased interdisciplinary cooperation between neuroscientists, engineers, computer programmers, psychologists, and rehabilitation specialists, and on adoption and widespread application of objective methods for evaluating alternative methods. The practical use of BCI technology depends on the development of appropriate applications, identification of appropriate user groups, and careful attention to the needs and desires of individual users. BCI research and development will also benefit from greater emphasis on peer-reviewed publications, and from adoption of standard venues for presentations and discussion.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Cerebral Cortex, Communication Aids for Disabled, Disabled Persons, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1063-6528}, doi = {10.1109/TRE.2000.847807}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10896178}, author = {Jonathan Wolpaw and Niels Birbaumer and Heetderks, W J and Dennis J. McFarland and Peckham, P H and Gerwin Schalk and Emanuel Donchin and Quatrano, L A and Robinson, C J and Theresa M Vaughan} } @article {3243, title = {Answering questions with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface.}, journal = {Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation}, volume = {79}, year = {1998}, month = {09/1998}, pages = {1029{\textendash}1033}, abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that humans can learn to control selected electroencephalographic components and use that control to answer simple questions. METHODS: Four adults (one with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) learned to use electroencephalogram (EEG) mu rhythm (8 to 12Hz) or beta rhythm (18 to 25Hz) activity over sensorimotor cortex to control vertical cursor movement to targets at the top or bottom edge of a video screen. In subsequent sessions, the targets were replaced with the words YES and NO, and individuals used the cursor to answer spoken YES/NO questions from single- or multiple-topic question sets. They confirmed their answers through the response verification (RV) procedure, in which the word positions were switched and the question was answered again. RESULTS: For 5 consecutive sessions after initial question training, individuals were asked an average of 4.0 to 4.6 questions per minute; 64\% to 87\% of their answers were confirmed by the RV procedure and 93\% to 99\% of these answers were correct. Performances for single- and multiple-topic question sets did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that (1) EEG-based cursor control can be used to answer simple questions with a high degree of accuracy, (2) attention to auditory queries and formulation of answers does not interfere with EEG-based cursor control, (3) question complexity (at least as represented by single versus multiple-topic question sets) does not noticeably affect performance, and (4) the RV procedure improves accuracy as expected. Several options for increasing the speed of communication appear promising. An EEG-based brain-computer interface could provide a new communication and control modality for people with severe motor disabilities.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0003-9993}, doi = {10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90165-4}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9749678}, author = {Miner, L. A. and Dennis J. McFarland and Jonathan Wolpaw} } @article {3256, title = {EEG-based brain computer interface (BCI). Search for optimal electrode positions and frequency components.}, journal = {Medical progress through technology}, volume = {21}, year = {1995}, month = {1996}, pages = {111{\textendash}121}, abstract = {Several laboratories around the world have recently started to investigate EEG-based brain computer interface (BCI) systems in order to create a new communication channel for subjects with severe motor impairments. The present paper describes an initial evaluation of 64-channel EEG data recorded while subjects used one EEG channel over the left sensorimotor area to control on-line vertical cursor movement. Targets were given at the top or bottom of a computer screen. Data from 3 subjects in the early stages of training were analyzed by calculating band power time courses and maps for top and bottom targets separately. In addition, the Distinction Sensitive Learning Vector Quantizer (DSLVQ) was applied to single-trial EEG data. It was found that for each subject there exist optimal electrode positions and frequency components for on-line EEG-based cursor control.}, keywords = {User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0047-6552}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8776708}, author = {Pfurtscheller, G. and Flotzinger, D. and Pregenzer, M. and Jonathan Wolpaw and Dennis J. McFarland} }