@article {3370, title = {Brain-computer interface (BCI) evaluation in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.}, journal = {Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener}, volume = {15}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, pages = {207-15}, abstract = {Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) might restore communication to people severely disabled by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or other disorders. We sought to: 1) define a protocol for determining whether a person with ALS can use a visual P300-based BCI; 2) determine what proportion of this population can use the BCI; and 3) identify factors affecting BCI performance. Twenty-five individuals with ALS completed an evaluation protocol using a standard 6 {\texttimes} 6 matrix and parameters selected by stepwise linear discrimination. With an 8-channel EEG montage, the subjects fell into two groups in BCI accuracy (chance accuracy 3\%). Seventeen averaged 92 ({\textpm} 3)\% (range 71-100\%), which is adequate for communication (G70 group). Eight averaged 12 ({\textpm} 6)\% (range 0-36\%), inadequate for communication (L40 subject group). Performance did not correlate with disability: 11/17 (65\%) of G70 subjects were severely disabled (i.e. ALSFRS-R < 5). All L40 subjects had visual impairments (e.g. nystagmus, diplopia, ptosis). P300 was larger and more anterior in G70 subjects. A 16-channel montage did not significantly improve accuracy. In conclusion, most people severely disabled by ALS could use a visual P300-based BCI for communication. In those who could not, visual impairment was the principal obstacle. For these individuals, auditory P300-based BCIs might be effective.}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Biofeedback, Psychology, brain-computer interfaces, Communication Disorders, Electroencephalography, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Online Systems, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time}, issn = {2167-9223}, doi = {10.3109/21678421.2013.865750}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24555843}, author = {McCane, Lynn M and Sellers, Eric W and Dennis J. McFarland and Mak, Joseph N and Carmack, C Steve and Zeitlin, Debra and Jonathan Wolpaw and Theresa M Vaughan} } @article {2203, title = {Current Trends in Hardware and Software for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs).}, journal = {J Neural Eng}, volume = {8}, year = {2011}, month = {04/2011}, pages = {025001}, abstract = {

A\ brain-computer interface\ (BCI) provides a non-muscular communication channel to people with and without disabilities.\ BCI\ devices consist of hardware and software.\ BCI\ hardware records signals from the\ brain, either invasively or non-invasively, using a series of device components.\ BCI\ software then translates these signals into device output commands and provides feedback. One may categorize different types of\ BCI\ applications into the following four categories: basic\ research, clinical/translational\ research, consumer products, and emerging applications. These four categories use\ BCI\ hardware and software, but have different sets of requirements. For example, while basic\ research\ needs to explore a wide range of system configurations, and thus requires a wide range of hardware and software capabilities, applications in the other three categories may be designed for relatively narrow purposes and thus may only need a very limited subset of capabilities. This paper summarizes technical aspects for each of these four categories of\ BCI\ applications. The results indicate that\ BCI\ technology is in transition from isolated demonstrations to systematic\ research\ and commercial\ development. This process requires several multidisciplinary efforts, including the\ development\ of better integrated and more robust\ BCI\ hardware and software, the definition of standardized\ interfaces, and the\ developmentof certification, dissemination and reimbursement procedures.

}, keywords = {Biofeedback, Psychology, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Software, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {1741-2552}, doi = {10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025001}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21436536}, author = {Peter Brunner and Bianchi, L and Guger, C and Cincotti, F and Gerwin Schalk} } @article {2199, title = {Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback.}, journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A}, volume = {107}, year = {2010}, month = {03/2010}, pages = {4430-5}, abstract = {

Imagery\ of\ motor\ movement plays an important role in learning of complex\ motor\ skills, from learning to serve in tennis to perfecting a pirouette in ballet. What and where are the neural substrates that underlie\ motorimagery-based\ learning? We measured electrocorticographic\ cortical\ surface potentials in eight human subjects during overt action and kinesthetic\ imagery\ of the same movement, focusing on power in "high frequency" (76-100 Hz) and "low frequency" (8-32 Hz) ranges. We quantitatively establish that the spatial distribution of local neuronal population\ activity\ during\ motorimagery\ mimics the spatial distribution of\ activity\ during actual\ motor\ movement. By comparing responses to electrocortical stimulation with\ imagery-induced\ cortical\ surface\ activity, we demonstrate the role of primary\ motor\ areas in movement\ imagery. The magnitude of\ imagery-induced\ corticalactivity\ change was approximately 25\% of that associated with actual movement. However, when subjects learned to use this\ imagery\ to control a computer cursor in a simple\ feedback\ task, the\ imagery-induced\ activity\ change was significantly augmented, even exceeding that of overt movement.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Electric Stimulation, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Young Adult}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.0913697107}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20160084}, author = {Miller, K.J. and Gerwin Schalk and Fetz, Eberhard E and den Nijs, Marcel and Ojemann, J G and Rao, Rajesh P N} } @article {2098, title = {Extraction and localization of mesoscopic motor control signals for human ECoG neuroprosthetics.}, journal = {J Neurosci Methods}, volume = {167}, year = {2008}, month = {01/2008}, pages = {63-81}, abstract = {

Electrocorticogram (ECoG) recordings for\ neuroprosthetics\ provide a\ mesoscopic\ level of abstraction of brain function between microwire single neuron recordings and the electroencephalogram (EEG). Single-trial\ ECoG\ neural interfaces require appropriate feature\ extraction\ and signal processing methods to identify and model in real-time signatures of\ motor\ events in spontaneous brain activity. Here, we develop the clinical experimental paradigm and analysis tools to record broadband (1Hz to 6kHz)\ ECoG\ from patients participating in a reaching and pointing task. Motivated by the significant role of amplitude modulated rate coding in extracellular spike based brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), we develop methods to quantify spatio-temporal intermittent increased\ ECoG\ voltages to determine if they provide viable\ control\ inputs for\ ECoG\ neural interfaces. This study seeks to explore preprocessing modalities that emphasize amplitude modulation across frequencies and channels in the\ ECoG\ above the level of noisy background fluctuations in order to derive the commands for complex, continuous\ control\ tasks. Preliminary experiments show that it is possible to derive online predictive models and spatially localize the generation of commands in the cortex for\ motor\ tasks using amplitude modulated\ ECoG.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Biofeedback, Psychology, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Hand, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Physical Therapy Modalities, Psychomotor Performance, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Spectrum Analysis, User-Computer Interface}, issn = {0165-0270}, doi = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.04.019}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17582507}, author = {Sanchez, Justin C and Gunduz, Aysegul and Carney, Paul R and Principe, Jose} } @article {2137, title = {Voluntary brain regulation and communication with electrocorticogram signals.}, journal = {Epilepsy Behav}, volume = {13}, year = {2008}, month = {08/2008}, pages = {300-6}, abstract = {

Brain-computer interfaces\ (BCIs) can be used for communication in writing without muscular activity or for learning to control seizures by voluntary regulation of\ brain\ signals such as the electroencephalogram (EEG). Three of five patients with epilepsy were able to spell their names with electrocorticogram (ECoG) signals derived from motor-related areas within only one or two training sessions. Imagery of finger or tongue movements was classified with support-vector classification of autoregressive coefficients derived from the ECoG signals. After training of the classifier, binary classification responses were used to select letters from a\ computer-generated menu. Offline analysis showed increased theta activity in the unsuccessful patients, whereas the successful patients exhibited dominant sensorimotor rhythms that they could control. The high spatial resolution and increased signal-to-noise ratio in ECoG signals, combined with short training periods, may offer an alternative for communication in complete paralysis, locked-in syndrome, and motor restoration.

}, keywords = {Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Cerebral Cortex, Communication Aids for Disabled, Dominance, Cerebral, Electroencephalography, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Motor Cortex, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software, Somatosensory Cortex, Theta Rhythm, User-Computer Interface, Writing}, issn = {1525-5069}, doi = {10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.03.014}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495541}, author = {Hinterberger, T. and Widman, Guido and Lal, T.N and Jeremy Jeremy Hill and Tangermann, Michael and Rosenstiel, W. and Sch{\"o}lkopf, B and Elger, Christian and Niels Birbaumer} }