01606nas a2200301 4500008004100000022001400041245007000055210006600125260001200191300001200203490000700215520071500222653001000937653002100947653002700968653002200995653001101017653002501028653003101053653004101084653001701125653002801142100002001170700002301190700001901213700002401232856004801256 2010 eng d a1558-253100aA procedure for measuring latencies in brain-computer interfaces.0 aprocedure for measuring latencies in braincomputer interfaces c06/2010 a1785-970 v573 a

Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems must process neural signals with consistent timing in order to support adequate system performance. Thus, it is important to have the capability to determine whether a particular BCI configuration (i.e., hardware and software) provides adequate timing performance for a particular experiment. This report presents a method of measuring and quantifying different aspects of system timing in several typical BCI experiments across a range of settings, and presents comprehensive measures of expected overall system latency for each experimental configuration.

10aBrain10aComputer Systems10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials10aHumans10aModels, Neurological10aReproducibility of Results10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aTime Factors10aUser-Computer Interface1 aWilson, Adam, J1 aMellinger, Jürgen1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWilliams, Justin, C uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2040378102202nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245007800055210006900133260001200202300001100214490000700225520114300232653001001375653001801385653002001403653003601423653002501459653002201484653001101506653001101517653001601528653000901544653002401553653002701577653002401604653002801628653001301656100002001669700002501689700002301714700001901737700002401756856004801780 2006 eng d a1534-432000aECoG factors underlying multimodal control of a brain-computer interface.0 aECoG factors underlying multimodal control of a braincomputer in c06/2006 a246-500 v143 a

Most current brain-computer interface (BCI) systems for humans use electroencephalographic activity recorded from the scalp, and may be limited in many ways. Electrocorticography (ECoG) is believed to be a minimally-invasive alternative to electroencephalogram (EEG) for BCI systems, yielding superior signal characteristics that could allow rapid user training and faster communication rates. In addition, our preliminary results suggest that brain regions other than the sensorimotor cortex, such as auditory cortex, may be trained to control a BCI system using similar methods as those used to train motor regions of the brain. This could prove to be vital for users who have neurological disease, head trauma, or other conditions precluding the use of sensorimotor cortex for BCI control.

10aAdult10aBrain Mapping10aCerebral Cortex10aCommunication Aids for Disabled10aComputer Peripherals10aEvoked Potentials10aFemale10aHumans10aImagination10aMale10aMan-Machine Systems10aNeuromuscular Diseases10aSystems Integration10aUser-Computer Interface10aVolition1 aWilson, Adam, J1 aFelton, Elizabeth, A1 aGarell, Charles, P1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWilliams, Justin, C uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792305