07041nas a2200313 4500008004100000022001400041245008200055210006900137260001200206300001100218490000600229520615100235653002806386653001006414653001806424653002706442653002106469653003106490653001106521653002406532653001306556653002806569100001906597700001506616700001306631700001606644700001906660856004806679 2011 eng d a1741-255200aCurrent Trends in Hardware and Software for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs).0 aCurrent Trends in Hardware and Software for BrainComputer Interf c04/2011 a0250010 v83 a

brain-computer interface (BCI) provides a non-muscular communication channel to people with and without disabilities. BCI devices consist of hardware and software. BCI hardware records signals from the brain, either invasively or non-invasively, using a series of device components. BCI software then translates these signals into device output commands and provides feedback. One may categorize different types of BCI applications into the following four categories: basic research, clinical/translational research, consumer products, and emerging applications. These four categories use BCI hardware and software, but have different sets of requirements. For example, while basic research needs to explore a wide range of system configurations, and thus requires a wide range of hardware and software capabilities, applications in the other three categories may be designed for relatively narrow purposes and thus may only need a very limited subset of capabilities. This paper summarizes technical aspects for each of these four categories of BCI applications. The results indicate that BCI technology is in transition from isolated demonstrations to systematic research and commercial development. This process requires several multidisciplinary efforts, including the development of better integrated and more robust BCI hardware and software, the definition of standardized interfaces, and the developmentof certification, dissemination and reimbursement procedures.

10aBiofeedback, Psychology10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aElectroencephalography10aEquipment Design10aEquipment Failure Analysis10aHumans10aMan-Machine Systems10aSoftware10aUser-Computer Interface1 aBrunner, Peter1 aBianchi, L1 aGuger, C1 aCincotti, F1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2143653602106nas a2200421 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001100226490000700237520091200244653001001156653001801166653001601184653003301200653002701233653001301260653001101273653001801284653002801302100001801330700002401348700001901372700002701391700002001418700002201438700002001460700002301480700001601503700002001519700001301539700001901552700002201571700002401593700001901617856004801636 2011 eng d a1525-506900aProceedings of the Second International Workshop on Advances in Electrocorticography.0 aProceedings of the Second International Workshop on Advances in  c12/2011 a641-500 v223 a

The Second International Workshop on Advances in Electrocorticography (ECoG) was convened in San Diego, CA, USA, on November 11-12, 2010. Between this meeting and the inaugural 2009 event, a much clearer picture has been emerging of cortical ECoG physiology and its relationship to local field potentials and single-cell recordings. Innovations in material engineering are advancing the goal of a stable long-term recording interface. Continued evolution of ECoG-driven brain-computer interface technology is determining innovation in neuroprosthetics. Improvements in instrumentation and statistical methodologies continue to elucidate ECoG correlates of normal human function as well as the ictal state. This proceedings document summarizes the current status of this rapidly evolving field.

10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aBrain Waves10aDiagnosis, Computer-Assisted10aElectroencephalography10aEpilepsy10aHumans10aUnited States10aUser-Computer Interface1 aRitaccio, A L1 aBoatman-Reich, Dana1 aBrunner, Peter1 aCervenka, Mackenzie, C1 aCole, Andrew, J1 aCrone, Nathan, E.1 aDuckrow, Robert1 aKorzeniewska, Anna1 aLitt, Brian1 aMiller, John, W1 aMoran, D1 aParvizi, Josef1 aViventi, Jonathan1 aWilliams, Justin, C1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2203628700601nas a2200205 4500008004100000022001400041245007100055210006800126260001200194300001100206490000800217653001400225653001000239653002100249653001100270653002800281100001900309700001900328856004800347 2011 eng d a1872-895200aToward a gaze-independent matrix speller brain-computer interface.0 aToward a gazeindependent matrix speller braincomputer interface c06/2011 a1063-40 v12210aAttention10aBrain10aFixation, Ocular10aHumans10aUser-Computer Interface1 aBrunner, Peter1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2118340402830nas a2200337 4500008004100000022001400041245004900055210004500104260001200149300001100161490000600172520196200178653001002140653003502150653001802185653001102203653001102214653000902225653001602234653002502250653002302275653002802298653001602326100001902342700001302361700001502374700002102389700001502410700001902425856004802444 2010 eng d a1741-255200aDoes the 'P300' speller depend on eye gaze?.0 aDoes the P300 speller depend on eye gaze c10/2010 a0560130 v73 a

Many people affected by debilitating neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem stroke or spinal cord injury are impaired in their ability to, or are even unable to, communicate. A brain-computer interface (BCI) uses brain signals, rather than muscles, to re-establish communication with the outside world. One particular BCI approach is the so-called 'P300 matrix speller' that was first described by Farwell and Donchin (1988 Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 510-23). It has been widely assumed that this method does not depend on the ability to focus on the desired character, because it was thought that it relies primarily on the P300-evoked potential and minimally, if at all, on other EEG features such as the visual-evoked potential (VEP). This issue is highly relevant for the clinical application of this BCI method, because eye movements may be impaired or lost in the relevant user population. This study investigated the extent to which the performance in a 'P300' speller BCI depends on eye gaze. We evaluated the performance of 17 healthy subjects using a 'P300' matrix speller under two conditions. Under one condition ('letter'), the subjects focused their eye gaze on the intended letter, while under the second condition ('center'), the subjects focused their eye gaze on a fixation cross that was located in the center of the matrix. The results show that the performance of the 'P300' matrix speller in normal subjects depends in considerable measure on gaze direction. They thereby disprove a widespread assumption in BCI research, and suggest that this BCI might function more effectively for people who retain some eye-movement control. The applicability of these findings to people with severe neuromuscular disabilities (particularly in eye-movements) remains to be determined.

10aAdult10aEvent-Related Potentials, P30010aEye Movements10aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aModels, Neurological10aPhotic Stimulation10aUser-Computer Interface10aYoung Adult1 aBrunner, Peter1 aJoshi, S1 aBriskin, S1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aBischof, H1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2085892405137nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245007500055210006900130260001200199300001000211490000800221520406800229653001004297653001504307653001004322653001804332653002404350653002704374653001104401653000904412653002404421653002404445653001904469653003604488653004104524653002404565653002804589100001904617700001904636700002404655700001504679700002104694856004804715 2008 eng d a0165-027000aBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs): Detection Instead of Classification.0 aBraincomputer interfaces BCIs Detection Instead of Classificatio c01/2008 a51-620 v1673 a

Many studies over the past two decades have shown that people can use brain signals to convey their intent to a computer through brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). These devices operate by recording signals from the brain and translating these signals into device commands. They can be used by people who are severely paralyzed to communicate without any use of muscle activity. One of the major impediments in translating this novel technology into clinical applications is the current requirement for preliminary analyses to identify the brain signal features best suited for communication. This paper introduces and validates signal detection, which does not require such analysis procedures, as a new concept in BCI signal processing. This detection concept is realized with Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) that are used to model resting brain activity so that any change in relevant brain signals can be detected. It is implemented in a package called SIGFRIED (SIGnal modeling For Real-time Identification and Event Detection). The results indicate that SIGFRIED produces results that are within the range of those achieved using a common analysis strategy that requires preliminary identification of signal features. They indicate that such laborious analysis procedures could be replaced by merely recording brain signals during rest. In summary, this paper demonstrates how SIGFRIED could be used to overcome one of the present impediments to translation of laboratory BCI demonstrations into clinically practical applications.

10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aElectrocardiography10aElectroencephalography10aHumans10aMale10aMan-Machine Systems10aNormal Distribution10aOnline Systems10aSignal Detection, Psychological10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aSoftware Validation10aUser-Computer Interface1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aBrunner, Peter1 aGerhardt, Lester, A1 aBischof, H1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17920134