02675nas a2200325   4500008004100000022001400041245010000055210006900155260001200224300001200236490000800248520178700256653001202043653002602055653001102081653001302092653001302105653001502118653000902133653000902142653002502151653002502176100001302201700001302214700001902227700001302246700002102259700002102280856004802301       2014                        eng d  a1522-159800aLocomotor impact of beneficial or nonbeneficial H-reflex conditioning after spinal cord injury.0 aLocomotor impact of beneficial or nonbeneficial Hreflex conditio  c03/2014  a1249-580 v1113 aWhen new motor learning changes neurons and synapses in the spinal cord, it may affect previously learned behaviors that depend on the same spinal neurons and synapses. To explore these effects, we used operant conditioning to strengthen or weaken the right soleus H-reflex pathway in rats in which a right spinal cord contusion had impaired locomotion. When up-conditioning increased the H-reflex, locomotion improved. Steps became longer, and step-cycle asymmetry (i.e., limping) disappeared. In contrast, when down-conditioning decreased the H-reflex, locomotion did not worsen. Steps did not become shorter, and asymmetry did not increase. Electromyographic and kinematic analyses explained how H-reflex increase improved locomotion and why H-reflex decrease did not further impair it. Although the impact of up-conditioning or down-conditioning on the H-reflex pathway was still present during locomotion, only up-conditioning affected the soleus locomotor burst. Additionally, compensatory plasticity apparently prevented the weaker H-reflex pathway caused by down-conditioning from weakening the locomotor burst and further impairing locomotion. The results support the hypothesis that the state of the spinal cord is a "negotiated equilibrium" that serves all the behaviors that depend on it. When new learning changes the spinal cord, old behaviors undergo concurrent relearning that preserves or improves their key features. Thus, if an old behavior has been impaired by trauma or disease, spinal reflex conditioning, by changing a specific pathway and triggering a new negotiation, may enable recovery beyond that achieved simply by practicing the old behavior. Spinal reflex conditioning protocols might complement other neurorehabilitation methods and enhance recovery.10aAnimals10aConditioning, Operant10aFemale10aH-Reflex10aLearning10aLocomotion10aMale10aRats10aRats, Sprague-Dawley10aSpinal Cord Injuries1 aChen, Yi1 aChen, Lu1 aLiu, Rongliang1 aWang, Yu1 aChen, Xiang Yang1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2437128802534nas a2200181   4500008004100000022001400041245010200055210006900157260001200226300001600238490000700254520196300261653002502224100002102249700001302270700002102283856004802304       2003                        eng d  a0022-307700aConditioned H-reflex increase persists after transection of the main corticospinal tract in rats.0 aConditioned Hreflex increase persists after transection of the m  c11/2003  a3572–35780 v903 aThe brain shapes spinal cord function throughout life. Operant conditioning of the H-reflex, the electrical analog of the spinal stretch reflex (SSR), is a relatively simple model for exploring the spinal cord plasticity underlying this functional change and may provide a new method for modifying spinal cord reflexes after spinal cord injury. In response to an operant conditioning protocol, rats can gradually increase (i.e., up-training mode) or decrease (i.e., down-training mode) the soleus H-reflex. This study explored the effects of midthoracic transection of the ipsilateral lateral column (LC) (rubrospinal, vestibulospinal, and reticulospinal tracts), the dorsal column corticospinal tract (CST), or the dorsal column ascending tract (DA) on maintenance of an H-reflex increase that has already occurred. Rats were implanted with EMG electrodes in the right soleus muscle and a nerve-stimulating cuff on the right posterior tibial nerve. After initial (i.e., control) H-reflex size was determined, the rats were exposed for 50 days to the up-training mode, in which reward was given when the H-reflex was above a criterion value. H-reflex size gradually rose to 168 +/- 12% (mean +/- SE) of its initial value. Each rat then received an LC, CST, or DA transection and continued under the up-training mode for 50 more days. None of the transections abolished the H-reflex increase. H-reflex size increased further to 197 +/- 19% of its initial value and did not differ significantly among LC, CST, and DA rats (P > 0.78 by ANOVA). Although earlier studies show that the main CST is needed for acquisition of H-reflex up-training and down-training and for maintenance of down-training, this study shows that it is not needed for maintenance of up-training. It adds to the evidence that H-reflex conditioning changes the spinal cord and that the spinal cord plasticity associated with up-training is different from that associated with down-training.10aSpinal Cord Injuries1 aChen, Xiang Yang1 aChen, Lu1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12917382