01542nas a2200193   4500008004100000022001400041245004000055210003800095260000800133300001200141490000600153520102900159653002901188653002001217653001901237100002201256700002101278856004901299       2017                        eng d  a2468-451100aEEG-based brain-computer interfaces0 aEEGbased braincomputer interfaces  cOct  a194-2000 v43 aBrain–Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are real-time computer-based systems that translate brain signals into useful commands. To date most applications have been demonstrations of proof-of-principle; widespread use by people who could benefit from this technology requires further development. Improvements in current EEG recording technology are needed. Better sensors would be easier to apply, more comfortable for the user, and produce higher quality and more stable signals. Although considerable effort has been devoted to evaluating classifiers using public datasets, more attention to real-time signal processing issues and to optimizing the mutually adaptive interaction between the brain and the BCI are essential for improving BCI performance. Further development of applications is also needed, particularly applications of BCI technology to rehabilitation. The design of rehabilitation applications hinges on the nature of BCI control and how it might be used to induce and guide beneficial plasticity in the brain.10abrain-computer interface10aneurotechnology10aRehabilitation1 aMcFarland, D., J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2143819301705nas a2200157   4500008004100000022001400041245008200055210006900137260001200206520117900218653002901397653002501426653002201451100002601473856004801499       2014                        eng d  a1872-769700aThe advantages of the surface Laplacian in brain-computer interface research.0 aadvantages of the surface Laplacian in braincomputer interface r  c08/20143 a<p>Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems frequently use signal processing methods, such as spatial filtering, to enhance performance. The surface Laplacian can reduce spatial noise and aid in identification of sources. In BCI research, these two functions of the surface Laplacian correspond to prediction accuracy and signal orthogonality. In the present study, an off-line analysis of data from a sensorimotor rhythm-based BCI task dissociated these functions of the surface Laplacian by comparing nearest-neighbor and next-nearest neighbor Laplacian algorithms. The nearest-neighbor Laplacian produced signals that were more orthogonal while the next-nearest Laplacian produced signals that resulted in better accuracy. Both prediction and signal identification are important for BCI research. Better prediction of user's intent produces increased speed and accuracy of communication and control. Signal identification is important for ruling out the possibility of control by artifacts. Identifying the nature of the control signal is relevant both to understanding exactly what is being studied and in terms of usability for individuals with limited motor control.</p>10abrain-computer interface10asensorimotor rhythms10asurface laplacian1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2509128601885nas a2200193   4500008004100000022001400041245009100055210006900146260001200215300001600227490000800243520126500251653002901516653002201545653002601567653002401593100002601617856004801643       2013                        eng d  a1872-895200aCharacterizing multivariate decoding models based on correlated EEG spectral features.0 aCharacterizing multivariate decoding models based on correlated   c07/2013  a1297–13020 v1243 aOBJECTIVE:
Multivariate decoding methods are popular techniques for analysis of neurophysiological data. The present study explored potential interpretative problems with these techniques when predictors are correlated.
METHODS:
Data from sensorimotor rhythm-based cursor control experiments was analyzed offline with linear univariate and multivariate models. Features were derived from autoregressive (AR) spectral analysis of varying model order which produced predictors that varied in their degree of correlation (i.e., multicollinearity).
RESULTS:
The use of multivariate regression models resulted in much better prediction of target position as compared to univariate regression models. However, with lower order AR features interpretation of the spectral patterns of the weights was difficult. This is likely to be due to the high degree of multicollinearity present with lower order AR features.
CONCLUSIONS:
Care should be exercised when interpreting the pattern of weights of multivariate models with correlated predictors. Comparison with univariate statistics is advisable.
SIGNIFICANCE:
While multivariate decoding algorithms are very useful for prediction their utility for interpretation may be limited when predictors are correlated.10abrain-computer interface10amulticollinearity10amultivariate decoding10asensorimotor rhythm1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2346626702447nas a2200229   4500008004100000022001400041245007700055210006700132260001200199300001400211490000800225520176000233653002901993653002002022653000902042100002602051700002602077700002102103700002402124700002102148856004802169       2011                        eng d  a1872-895200aThe P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI): effects of stimulus rate.0 aP300based braincomputer interface BCI effects of stimulus rate  c04/2011  a731–7370 v1223 aOBJECTIVE:
Brain-computer interface technology can restore communication and control to people who are severely paralyzed. We have developed a non-invasive BCI based on the P300 event-related potential that uses an 8×9 matrix of 72 items that flash in groups of 6. Stimulus presentation rate (i.e., flash rate) is one of several parameters that could affect the speed and accuracy of performance. We studied performance (i.e., accuracy and characters/min) on copy spelling as a function of flash rate.
METHODS:
In the first study of six BCI users, stimulus-on and stimulus-off times were equal and flash rate was 4, 8, 16, or 32 Hz. In the second study of five BCI users, flash rate was varied by changing either the stimulus-on or stimulus-off time.
RESULTS:
For all users, lower flash rates gave higher accuracy. The flash rate that gave the highest characters/min varied across users, ranging from 8 to 32 Hz. However, variations in stimulus-on and stimulus-off times did not themselves significantly affect accuracy. Providing feedback did not affect results in either study suggesting that offline analyses should readily generalize to online performance. However there do appear to be session-specific effects that can influence the generalizability of classifier results.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results show that stimulus presentation (i.e., flash) rate affects the accuracy and speed of P300 BCI performance.
SIGNIFICANCE:
These results extend the range over which slower flash rates increase the amplitude of the P300. Considering also presentation time, the optimal rate differs among users, and thus should be set empirically for each user. Optimal flash rate might also vary with other parameters such as the number of items in the matrix.10abrain-computer interface10aneuroprosthesis10aP3001 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aSarnacki, William, A.1 aTownsend, George1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2106797001319nas a2200205   4500008004100000022001400041245008200055210006900137260001200206300001400218490000800232520070000240653001500940653002900955653000800984100002600992700002601018700002101044856004801065       2011                        eng d  a1872-678X00aShould the parameters of a BCI translation algorithm be continually adapted?.0 aShould the parameters of a BCI translation algorithm be continua  c07/2011  a103–1070 v1993 aPeople with or without motor disabilities can learn to control sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) recorded from the scalp to move a computer cursor in one or more dimensions or can use the P300 event-related potential as a control signal to make discrete selections. Data collected from individuals using an SMR-based or P300-based BCI were evaluated offline to estimate the impact on performance of continually adapting the parameters of the translation algorithm during BCI operation. The performance of the SMR-based BCI was enhanced by adaptive updating of the feature weights or adaptive normalization of the features. In contrast, P300 performance did not benefit from either of these procedures.10aadaptation10abrain-computer interface10aEEG1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aSarnacki, William, A.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2157100401826nas a2200217   4500008004100000022001400041245007300055210006900128260001200197300001600209490000800225520117900233653002901412653000801441653001801449100002501467700002101492700002101513700002601534856004801560       2011                        eng d  a1872-895200aTrained modulation of sensorimotor rhythms can affect reaction time.0 aTrained modulation of sensorimotor rhythms can affect reaction t  c09/2011  a1820–18260 v1223 aOBJECTIVE:
Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology might be useful for rehabilitation of motor function. This speculation is based on the premise that modifying the EEG will modify behavior, a proposition for which there is limited empirical data. The present study examined the possibility that voluntary modulation of sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) can affect motor behavior in normal human subjects.
METHODS:
Six individuals performed a cued-reaction task with variable warning periods. A typical variable foreperiod effect was associated with SMR desynchronization. SMR features that correlated with reaction times were then used to control a two-target cursor movement BCI task. Following successful BCI training, an uncued reaction time task was embedded within the cursor movement task.
RESULTS:
Voluntarily increasing SMR beta rhythms was associated with longer reaction times than decreasing SMR beta rhythms.
CONCLUSIONS:
Voluntary modulation of EEG SMR can affect motor behavior.
SIGNIFICANCE:
These results encourage studies that integrate BCI training into rehabilitation protocols and examine its capacity to augment restoration of useful motor function.10abrain-computer interface10aEEG10aReaction Time1 aBoulay, Chadwick, B.1 aSarnacki, W., A.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2141136601741nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245008200055210006900137260001200206300001400218490000700232520097500239653000801214653002901222653002201251653002401273100003201297700002601329700002001355700002401375700001901399700002101418856004801439       2009                        eng d  a1873-624600aA scanning protocol for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface.0 ascanning protocol for a sensorimotor rhythmbased braincomputer i  c02/2009  a169–1750 v803 aThe scanning protocol is a novel brain-computer interface (BCI) implementation that can be controlled with sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) of the electroencephalogram (EEG). The user views a screen that shows four choices in a linear array with one marked as target. The four choices are successively highlighted for 2.5s each. When a target is highlighted, the user can select it by modulating the SMR. An advantage of this method is the capacity to choose among multiple choices with just one learned SMR modulation. Each of 10 naive users trained for ten 30 min sessions over 5 weeks. User performance improved significantly (p<0.001) over the sessions and ranged from 30 to 80% mean accuracy of the last three sessions (chance accuracy=25%). The incidence of correct selections depended on the target position. These results suggest that, with further improvements, a scanning protocol can be effective. The ultimate goal is to expand it to a large matrix of selections.10aBCI10abrain-computer interface10ascanning protocol10asensorimotor rhythm1 aFriedrich, Elisabeth, V. C.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aNeuper, Christa1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aBrunner, Peter1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1878660302112nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245004800055210004100103260001200144300001200156490000800168520133600176653002201512653002901534653000801563653002001571653001501591653002401606100001901630700001901649700001601668700002301684700002601707700002101733700002001754856004801774       2008                        eng d  a0165-027000aAn auditory brain-computer interface (BCI).0 aauditory braincomputer interface BCI  c01/2008  a43–500 v1673 aBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate brain activity into signals controlling external devices. BCIs based on visual stimuli can maintain communication in severely paralyzed patients, but only if intact vision is available. Debilitating neurological disorders however, may lead to loss of intact vision. The current study explores the feasibility of an auditory BCI. Sixteen healthy volunteers participated in three training sessions consisting of 30 2-3 min runs in which they learned to increase or decrease the amplitude of sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) of the EEG. Half of the participants were presented with visual and half with auditory feedback. Mood and motivation were assessed prior to each session. Although BCI performance in the visual feedback group was superior to the auditory feedback group there was no difference in performance at the end of the third session. Participants in the auditory feedback group learned slower, but four out of eight reached an accuracy of over 70% correct in the last session comparable to the visual feedback group. Decreasing performance of some participants in the visual feedback group is related to mood and motivation. We conclude that with sufficient training time an auditory BCI may be as efficient as a visual BCI. Mood and motivation play a role in learning to use a BCI.10aauditory feedback10abrain-computer interface10aEEG10alocked-in state10amotivation10asensorimotor rhythm1 aNijboer, Femke1 aFurdea, Adrian1 aGunst, Ingo1 aMellinger, Jürgen1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aKübler, Andrea  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1739979701649nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245004600055210004500101260001200146300001200158490000800170520095000178653002901128653002901157653001701186653004201203100002301245700002001268700002601288700002401314700002101338856004801359       2008                        eng d  a0165-027000aToward enhanced P300 speller performance.0 aToward enhanced P300 speller performance  c01/2008  a15–210 v1673 aThis study examines the effects of expanding the classical P300 feature space on the classification performance of data collected from a P300 speller paradigm [Farwell LA, Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1988;70:510-23]. Using stepwise linear discriminant analysis (SWLDA) to construct a classifier, the effects of spatial channel selection, channel referencing, data decimation, and maximum number of model features are compared with the intent of establishing a baseline not only for the SWLDA classifier, but for related P300 speller classification methods in general. By supplementing the classical P300 recording locations with posterior locations, online classification performance of P300 speller responses can be significantly improved using SWLDA and the favorable parameters derived from the offline comparative analysis.10abrain-computer interface10aevent related potentials10aP300 speller10astepwise linear discriminant analysis1 aKrusienski, D., J.1 aSellers, E., W.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1782277702016nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245013800055210006900193260001200262300001400274490000700288520114400295653003401439653002901473653002501502653002901527653000901556653001901565100002201584700002501606700002601631700002401657700002101681856004801702       2006                        eng d  a0301-051100aA P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance.0 aP300 eventrelated potential braincomputer interface BCI the effe  c10/2006  a242–2520 v733 aWe describe a study designed to assess properties of a P300 brain-computer interface (BCI). The BCI presents the user with a matrix containing letters and numbers. The user attends to a character to be communicated and the rows and columns of the matrix briefly intensify. Each time the attended character is intensified it serves as a rare event in an oddball sequence and it elicits a P300 response. The BCI works by detecting which character elicited a P300 response. We manipulated the size of the character matrix (either 3 x 3 or 6 x 6) and the duration of the inter stimulus interval (ISI) between intensifications (either 175 or 350 ms). Online accuracy was highest for the 3 x 3 matrix 175-ms ISI condition, while bit rate was highest for the 6 x 6 matrix 175-ms ISI condition. Average accuracy in the best condition for each subject was 88%. P300 amplitude was significantly greater for the attended stimulus and for the 6 x 6 matrix. This work demonstrates that matrix size and ISI are important variables to consider when optimizing a BCI system for individual users and that a P300-BCI can be used for effective communication.10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10abrain-computer interface10aelectroencephalogram10aevent-related potentials10aP30010aRehabilitation1 aSellers, Eric, W.1 aKrusienski, Dean, J.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1686092003537nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245009500055210006900150260001200219300001200231490000800243520277200251653002903023653000803052653002703060653001303087653001403100653002403114100002603138700002603164700002403190700002103214856004803235       2005                        eng d  a1388-245700aBrain-computer interface (BCI) operation: signal and noise during early training sessions.0 aBraincomputer interface BCI operation signal and noise during ea  c01/2005  a56–620 v1163 aOBJECTIVE:
People can learn to control mu (8-12 Hz) or beta (18-25 Hz) rhythm amplitude in the electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a video screen. The recorded signal may also contain electromyogram (EMG) and other non-EEG artifacts. This study examines the presence and characteristics of EMG contamination during new users' initial brain-computer interface (BCI) training sessions, as they first attempt to acquire control over mu or beta rhythm amplitude and to use that control to move a cursor to a target.
METHODS:
In the standard one-dimensional format, a target appears along the right edge of the screen and 1s later the cursor appears in the middle of the left edge and moves across the screen at a fixed rate with its vertical movement controlled by a linear function of mu or beta rhythm amplitude. In the basic two-choice version, the target occupies the upper or lower half of the right edge. The user's task is to move the cursor vertically so that it hits the target when it reaches the right edge. The present data comprise the first 10 sessions of BCI training from each of 7 users. Their data were selected to illustrate the variations seen in EMG contamination across users.
RESULTS:
Five of the 7 users learned to change rhythm amplitude appropriately, so that the cursor hit the target. Three of these 5 showed no evidence of EMG contamination. In the other two of these 5, EMG was prominent in early sessions, and tended to be associated with errors rather than with hits. As EEG control improved over the 10 sessions, this EMG contamination disappeared. In the remaining two users, who never acquired actual EEG control, EMG was prominent in initial sessions and tended to move the cursor to the target. This EMG contamination was still detectable by Session 10.
CONCLUSIONS:
EMG contamination arising from cranial muscles is often present early in BCI training and gradually wanes. In those users who eventually acquire EEG control, early target-related EMG contamination may be most prominent for unsuccessful trials, and may reflect user frustration. In those users who never acquire EEG control, EMG may initially serve to move the cursor toward the target. Careful and comprehensive topographical and spectral analyses throughout user training are essential for detecting EMG contamination and differentiating between cursor control provided by EEG control and cursor control provided by EMG contamination.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Artifacts such as EMG are common in EEG recordings. Comprehensive spectral and topographical analyses are necessary to detect them and ensure that they do not masquerade as, or interfere with acquisition of, actual EEG-based cursor control.10abrain-computer interface10aEEG10aElectroencephalography10aLearning10amu rhythm10asensorimotor cortex1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aSarnacki, William, A.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1558918401351nas a2200409   4500008004100000020001800041245007500059210006900134260003300203653002700236653003000263653001900293653002900312653002500341653003300366653003400399653000800433653002700441653003900468653002100507653001700528653002000545653002900565653003000594653001500624653001800639653002300657653002600680653001100706653002300717653004000740100002400780700001900804700002600823700002100849856007100870       2005                        eng d  a0-7803-8710-400aTracking of the mu rhythm using an empirically derived matched filter.0 aTracking of the mu rhythm using an empirically derived matched f  aArlington, VAbIEEEc03/200510abioelectric potentials10aBrain Computer Interfaces10abrain modeling10abrain-computer interface10acommunication device10acommunication system control10acortical mu rhythm modulation10aEEG10aElectroencephalography10aempirically derived matched filter10ahandicapped aids10alaboratories10amatched filters10amedical signal detection10amedical signal processing10amonitoring10amotor imagery10amu rhythm tracking10anoninvasive treatment10arhythm10asynchronous motors10atwo-dimensional cursor control data1 aKrusienski, Dean, J1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=141955901629nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245010300055210006900158260001200227300001200239490000800251520078600259653003101045653002901076653002801105653002701133653002401160653002001184653001901204100001901223700002601242700002601268700002101294856004801315       2003                        eng d  a0304-394000aElectroencephalographic(EEG)-based communication: EEG control versus system performance in humans.0 aElectroencephalographicEEGbased communication EEG control versus  c07/2002  a89–920 v3453 aPeople can learn to control electroencephalographic (EEG) sensorimotor rhythm amplitude so as to move a cursor to select among choices on a computer screen. We explored the dependence of system performance on EEG control. Users moved the cursor to reach a target at one of four possible locations. EEG control was measured as the correlation (r(2)) between rhythm amplitude and target location. Performance was measured as accuracy (% of targets hit) and as information transfer rate (bits/trial). The relationship between EEG control and accuracy can be approximated by a linear function that is constant for all users. The results facilitate offline predictions of the effects on performance of using different EEG features or combinations of features to control cursor movement.10aaugmentative communication10abrain-computer interface10abrain-machine interface10aElectroencephalography10amu and beta rhythms10aneuroprosthesis10aRehabilitation1 aSheikh, Hesham1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aSarnacki, William, A.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1282117802517nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245007400055210006900129260001200198300001600210490000800226520179400234653001302028653002902041653002502070653001902095653001902114100002302133700002602156700002402182700002102206856004802227       2003                        eng d  a1388-245700aEMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics.0 aEMG contamination of EEG spectral and topographical characterist  c09/2003  a1580–15930 v1143 aOBJECTIVE:
Electromyogram (EMG) contamination is often a problem in electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, particularly, for those applications such as EEG-based brain-computer interfaces that rely on automated measurements of EEG features. As an essential prelude to developing methods for recognizing and eliminating EMG contamination of EEG, this study defines the spectral and topographical characteristics of frontalis and temporalis muscle EMG over the entire scalp. It describes both average data and the range of individual differences.
METHODS:
In 25 healthy adults, signals from 64 scalp and 4 facial locations were recorded during relaxation and during defined (15, 30, or 70% of maximum) contractions of frontalis or temporalis muscles.
RESULTS:
In the average data, EMG had a broad frequency distribution from 0 to >200 Hz. Amplitude was greatest at 20-30 Hz frontally and 40-80 Hz temporally. Temporalis spectra also showed a smaller peak around 20 Hz. These spectral components attenuated and broadened centrally. Even with weak (15%) contraction, EMG was detectable (P<0.001) near the vertex at frequencies >12 Hz in the average data and >8 Hz in some individuals.
CONCLUSIONS:
Frontalis or temporalis muscle EMG recorded from the scalp has spectral and topographical features that vary substantially across individuals. EMG spectra often have peaks in the beta frequency range that resemble EEG beta peaks.
SIGNIFICANCE:
While EMG contamination is greatest at the periphery of the scalp near the active muscles, even weak contractions can produce EMG that obscures or mimics EEG alpha, mu, or beta rhythms over the entire scalp. Recognition and elimination of this contamination is likely to require recording from an appropriate set of peripheral scalp locations.10aartifact10abrain-computer interface10aelectroencephalogram10aelectromyogram10aRehabilitation1 aGoncharova, I., I.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1294878701315nas a2200289   4500008004100000022001400041245006100055210005800116260001200174300001600186490000800202520045900210653003100669653002900700653002700729653002000756653002900776653002800805653001400833653001900847653002400866100001900890700002100909700002600930700002100956856004800977       2000                        eng d  a1388-245700aEEG-based communication: presence of an error potential.0 aEEGbased communication presence of an error potential  c12/2000  a2138–21440 v1113 aEEG-based communication could be a valuable new augmentative communication technology for those with severe motor disabilities. Like all communication methods, it faces the problem of errors in transmission. In the Wadsworth EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) system, subjects learn to use mu or beta rhythm amplitude to move a cursor to targets on a computer screen. While cursor movement is highly accurate in trained subjects, it is not perfect.10aaugmentative communication10abrain-computer interface10aElectroencephalography10aerror potential10aerror related negativity10aevent related potential10amu rhythm10aRehabilitation10asensorimotor cortex1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aPfurtscheller, G  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11090763