02675nas a2200325   4500008004100000022001400041245010000055210006900155260001200224300001200236490000800248520178700256653001202043653002602055653001102081653001302092653001302105653001502118653000902133653000902142653002502151653002502176100001302201700001302214700001902227700001302246700002102259700002102280856004802301       2014                        eng d  a1522-159800aLocomotor impact of beneficial or nonbeneficial H-reflex conditioning after spinal cord injury.0 aLocomotor impact of beneficial or nonbeneficial Hreflex conditio  c03/2014  a1249-580 v1113 aWhen new motor learning changes neurons and synapses in the spinal cord, it may affect previously learned behaviors that depend on the same spinal neurons and synapses. To explore these effects, we used operant conditioning to strengthen or weaken the right soleus H-reflex pathway in rats in which a right spinal cord contusion had impaired locomotion. When up-conditioning increased the H-reflex, locomotion improved. Steps became longer, and step-cycle asymmetry (i.e., limping) disappeared. In contrast, when down-conditioning decreased the H-reflex, locomotion did not worsen. Steps did not become shorter, and asymmetry did not increase. Electromyographic and kinematic analyses explained how H-reflex increase improved locomotion and why H-reflex decrease did not further impair it. Although the impact of up-conditioning or down-conditioning on the H-reflex pathway was still present during locomotion, only up-conditioning affected the soleus locomotor burst. Additionally, compensatory plasticity apparently prevented the weaker H-reflex pathway caused by down-conditioning from weakening the locomotor burst and further impairing locomotion. The results support the hypothesis that the state of the spinal cord is a "negotiated equilibrium" that serves all the behaviors that depend on it. When new learning changes the spinal cord, old behaviors undergo concurrent relearning that preserves or improves their key features. Thus, if an old behavior has been impaired by trauma or disease, spinal reflex conditioning, by changing a specific pathway and triggering a new negotiation, may enable recovery beyond that achieved simply by practicing the old behavior. Spinal reflex conditioning protocols might complement other neurorehabilitation methods and enhance recovery.10aAnimals10aConditioning, Operant10aFemale10aH-Reflex10aLearning10aLocomotion10aMale10aRats10aRats, Sprague-Dawley10aSpinal Cord Injuries1 aChen, Yi1 aChen, Lu1 aLiu, Rongliang1 aWang, Yu1 aChen, Xiang Yang1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2437128801203nas a2200277   4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001000226490000700236520041500243653001200658653002600670653001300696653001100709653001700720653002100737653002400758653001100782653001600793653002500809100002200834700002100856856004800877       2014                        eng d  a1538-300800aThe simplest motor skill: mechanisms and applications of reflex operant conditioning.0 asimplest motor skill mechanisms and applications of reflex opera  c04/2014  a82-900 v423 aOperant conditioning protocols can change spinal reflexes gradually, which are the simplest behaviors. This article summarizes the evidence supporting two propositions: that these protocols provide excellent models for defining the substrates of learning and that they can induce and guide plasticity to help restore skills, such as locomotion, that have been impaired by spinal cord injury or other disorders.10aAnimals10aConditioning, Operant10aH-Reflex10aHumans10aMotor Skills10aMuscle, Skeletal10aNeuronal Plasticity10aReflex10aSpinal Cord10aSpinal Cord Injuries1 aThompson, Aiko, K1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24508738