02392nas a2200361   4500008004100000022001400041245008900055210006900144260001200213300001600225490000800241520135100249653003401600653002901634653002501663653002901688653000901717653001901726100001601745700002001761700001701781700001901798700001301817700001901830700001401849700001501863700002301878700002401901700002101925700002101946700001501967856004801982       2008                        eng d  a1388-245700aA P300-based brain-computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.0 aP300based braincomputer interface for people with amyotrophic la  c08/2008  a1909–19160 v1193 aOBJECTIVE:
The current study evaluates the efficacy of a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) communication device for individuals with advanced ALS.
METHODS:
Participants attended to one cell of a N x N matrix while the N rows and N columns flashed randomly. Each cell of the matrix contained one character. Every flash of an attended character served as a rare event in an oddball sequence and elicited a P300 response. Classification coefficients derived using a stepwise linear discriminant function were applied to the data after each set of flashes. The character receiving the highest discriminant score was presented as feedback.
RESULTS:
In Phase I, six participants used a 6 x 6 matrix on 12 separate days with a mean rate of 1.2 selections/min and mean online and offline accuracies of 62% and 82%, respectively. In Phase II, four participants used either a 6 x 6 or a 7 x 7 matrix to produce novel and spontaneous statements with a mean online rate of 2.1 selections/min and online accuracy of 79%. The amplitude and latency of the P300 remained stable over 40 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS:
Participants could communicate with the P300-based BCI and performance was stable over many months.
SIGNIFICANCE:
BCIs could provide an alternative communication and control technology in the daily lives of people severely disabled by ALS.10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10abrain-computer interface10aelectroencephalogram10aevent-related potentials10aP30010aRehabilitation1 aNijboer, F.1 aSellers, E., W.1 aMellinger, J1 aJordan, M., A.1 aMatuz, T1 aFurdea, Adrian1 aHalder, S1 aMochty, U.1 aKrusienski, D., J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aKübler, A  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1857198402016nas a2200265   4500008004100000022001400041245013800055210006900193260001200262300001400274490000700288520114400295653003401439653002901473653002501502653002901527653000901556653001901565100002201584700002501606700002601631700002401657700002101681856004801702       2006                        eng d  a0301-051100aA P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance.0 aP300 eventrelated potential braincomputer interface BCI the effe  c10/2006  a242–2520 v733 aWe describe a study designed to assess properties of a P300 brain-computer interface (BCI). The BCI presents the user with a matrix containing letters and numbers. The user attends to a character to be communicated and the rows and columns of the matrix briefly intensify. Each time the attended character is intensified it serves as a rare event in an oddball sequence and it elicits a P300 response. The BCI works by detecting which character elicited a P300 response. We manipulated the size of the character matrix (either 3 x 3 or 6 x 6) and the duration of the inter stimulus interval (ISI) between intensifications (either 175 or 350 ms). Online accuracy was highest for the 3 x 3 matrix 175-ms ISI condition, while bit rate was highest for the 6 x 6 matrix 175-ms ISI condition. Average accuracy in the best condition for each subject was 88%. P300 amplitude was significantly greater for the attended stimulus and for the 6 x 6 matrix. This work demonstrates that matrix size and ISI are important variables to consider when optimizing a BCI system for individual users and that a P300-BCI can be used for effective communication.10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10abrain-computer interface10aelectroencephalogram10aevent-related potentials10aP30010aRehabilitation1 aSellers, Eric, W.1 aKrusienski, Dean, J.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aWolpaw, Jonathan  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1686092002176nas a2200217   4500008004100000022001400041245009600055210006900151260001200220300001400232490000800246520147500254653003601729653002901765653003401794653001001828653002201838100002601860700002401886856004801910       2004                        eng d  a0378-595500aSeparating stimulus-locked and unlocked components of the auditory event-related potential.0 aSeparating stimuluslocked and unlocked components of the auditor  c07/2004  a111–1200 v1933 aA new method is evaluated for separating stimulus-locked and unlocked components of auditory event-related EEG activity. The new method uses a regression based subtraction procedure as a way to account for latency and amplitude variability within individual trials. It was applied using the oddball paradigm under conditions of active and passive listening and analyzed as spectral correlations (normalized differences) between post-stimulus epochs of standard, target or deviant stimulus conditions and silent pre-stimulus baseline activity. The regression-subtraction procedure accounted for a greater amount of variance than a method that uses linear subtraction alone. The major component of the response to auditory stimulation was an event-related synchronization in the delta and theta (2-4 Hz) frequency range. Event-related desynchronizations were also observed in the 10 Hz (alpha/mu) and in the 20-30 Hz (beta) frequency range. The regression based subtraction procedure provides better separation of stimulus-locked and unlocked components of event-related EEG activity then linear subtraction alone. Stimulus-locked and unlocked components show different patterns and topographies of effects related to attention and active discrimination. Studying both stimulus-locked and unlocked components of event-related EEG reactivity in the frequency domain provides a more comprehensive account of dynamic brain activity subserving auditory information processing.10aevent-related desynchronization10aevent-related potentials10aevent-related synchronization10aphase10aspectral dynamics1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aCacace, Anthony, T.  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15219326