03428nas a2200361 4500008004100000022001400041245014400055210006900199260001300268300001100281490000800292520223300300653001002533653002002543653001502563653002602578653002702604653001102631653003102642100003102673700002702704700002002731700001702751700002102768700001902789700001902808700002302827700002602850700002702876700001802903700002602921856011902947 2024 eng d a1872-678X00aAnatomical registration of intracranial electrodes. Robust model-based localization and deformable smooth brain-shift compensation methods.0 aAnatomical registration of intracranial electrodes Robust modelb c2024 Apr a1100560 v4043 a

BACKGROUND: Intracranial electrodes are typically localized from post-implantation CT artifacts. Automatic algorithms localizing low signal-to-noise ratio artifacts and high-density electrode arrays are missing. Additionally, implantation of grids/strips introduces brain deformations, resulting in registration errors when fusing post-implantation CT and pre-implantation MR images. Brain-shift compensation methods project electrode coordinates to cortex, but either fail to produce smooth solutions or do not account for brain deformations.

NEW METHODS: We first introduce GridFit, a model-based fitting approach that simultaneously localizes all electrodes' CT artifacts in grids, strips, or depth arrays. Second, we present CEPA, a brain-shift compensation algorithm combining orthogonal-based projections, spring-mesh models, and spatial regularization constraints.

RESULTS: We tested GridFit on ∼6000 simulated scenarios. The localization of CT artifacts showed robust performance under difficult scenarios, such as noise, overlaps, and high-density implants (<1 mm errors). Validation with data from 20 challenging patients showed 99% accurate localization of the electrodes (3160/3192). We tested CEPA brain-shift compensation with data from 15 patients. Projections accounted for simple mechanical deformation principles with < 0.4 mm errors. The inter-electrode distances smoothly changed across neighbor electrodes, while changes in inter-electrode distances linearly increased with projection distance.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: GridFit succeeded in difficult scenarios that challenged available methods and outperformed visual localization by preserving the inter-electrode distance. CEPA registration errors were smaller than those obtained for well-established alternatives. Additionally, modeling resting-state high-frequency activity in five patients further supported CEPA.

CONCLUSION: GridFit and CEPA are versatile tools for registering intracranial electrode coordinates, providing highly accurate results even in the most challenging implantation scenarios. The methods are implemented in the iElectrodes open-source toolbox.

10aBrain10aCerebral Cortex10aElectrodes10aElectrodes, Implanted10aElectroencephalography10aHumans10aMagnetic Resonance Imaging1 aBlenkmann, Alejandro, Omar1 aLeske, Sabine, Liliana1 aLlorens, Anaïs1 aLin, Jack, J1 aChang, Edward, F1 aBrunner, Peter1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aIvanovic, Jugoslav1 aLarsson, Pål, Gunnar1 aKnight, Robert, Thomas1 aEndestad, Tor1 aSolbakk, Anne-Kristin uhttps://neurotechcenter.org/publications/2024/anatomical-registration-intracranial-electrodes-robust-model-based-004192nas a2200409 4500008004100000022001400041245005900055210005700114260001200171300001100183490000700194520303500201653001403236653001403250653001503264653002703279653001303306653001103319653004003330653003103370653002903401653001103430653002203441653002803463653002203491653001703513653002803530100002803558700001703586700002303603700002503626700001903651700002003670700002403690700002003714856004803734 2010 eng d a1531-824900aBrain-computer interfacing based on cognitive control.0 aBraincomputer interfacing based on cognitive control c06/2010 a809-160 v673 a

OBJECTIVE: 

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) translate deliberate intentions and associated changes in brain activity into action, thereby offering patients with severe paralysis an alternative means of communication with and control over their environment. Such systems are not available yet, partly due to the high performance standard that is required. A major challenge in the development of implantable BCIs is to identify cortical regions and related functions that an individual can reliably and consciously manipulate. Research predominantly focuses on the sensorimotor cortex, which can be activated by imagining motor actions. However, because this region may not provide an optimal solution to all patients, other neuronal networks need to be examined. Therefore, we investigated whether the cognitive control network can be used for BCI purposes. We also determined the feasibility of using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for noninvasive localization of the cognitive control network.

METHODS: 

Three patients with intractable epilepsy, who were temporarily implanted with subdural grid electrodes for diagnostic purposes, attempted to gain BCI control using the electrocorticographic (ECoG) signal of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).

RESULTS: 

All subjects quickly gained accurate BCI control by modulation of gamma-power of the left DLPFC. Prelocalization of the relevant region was performed with fMRI and was confirmed using the ECoG signals obtained during mental calculation localizer tasks.

INTERPRETATION: 

The results indicate that the cognitive control network is a suitable source of signals for BCI applications. They also demonstrate the feasibility of translating understanding about cognitive networks derived from functional neuroimaging into clinical applications.

10aCognition10aComputers10aElectrodes10aElectroencephalography10aEpilepsy10aHumans10aImage Processing, Computer-Assisted10aMagnetic Resonance Imaging10aNeuropsychological Tests10aOxygen10aPrefrontal Cortex10aPsychomotor Performance10aSpectrum Analysis10aTime Factors10aUser-Computer Interface1 aVansteensel, Mariska, J1 aHermes, Dora1 aAarnoutse, Erik, J1 aBleichner, Martin, G1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aRijen, Peter, C1 aLeijten, Frans, S S1 aRamsey, Nick, F uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2051794302198nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214520150500226653001001731653001601741653001501757653002701772653001101799653002801810100002001838700001901858700001901877700002401896856004801920 2009 eng d a1940-087X00aUsing an EEG-based brain-computer interface for virtual cursor movement with BCI2000.0 aUsing an EEGbased braincomputer interface for virtual cursor mov c07/20093 a

A brain-computer interface (BCI) functions by translating a neural signal, such as the electroencephalogram (EEG), into a signal that can be used to control a computer or other device. The amplitude of the EEG signals in selected frequency bins are measured and translated into a device command, in this case the horizontal and vertical velocity of a computer cursor. First, the EEG electrodes are applied to the user s scalp using a cap to record brain activity. Next, a calibration procedure is used to find the EEG electrodes and features that the user will learn to voluntarily modulate to use the BCI. In humans, the power in the mu (8-12 Hz) and beta (18-28 Hz) frequency bands decrease in amplitude during a real or imagined movement. These changes can be detected in the EEG in real-time, and used to control a BCI ([1],[2]). Therefore, during a screening test, the user is asked to make several different imagined movements with their hands and feet to determine the unique EEG features that change with the imagined movements. The results from this calibration will show the best channels to use, which are configured so that amplitude changes in the mu and beta frequency bands move the cursor either horizontally or vertically. In this experiment, the general purpose BCI system BCI2000 is used to control signal acquisition, signal processing, and feedback to the user [3].

10aBrain10aCalibration10aElectrodes10aElectroencephalography10aHumans10aUser-Computer Interface1 aWilson, Adam, J1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aWalton, Léo M1 aWilliams, Justin, C uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1964147902352nas a2200445 4500008004100000245007200041210006900113260003300182520109300215653001501308653001001323653001501333653003401348653002001382653001801402653002401420653001501444653002701459653002801486653001301514653001101527653001401538653001401552653001101566653000901577653001601586653001701602653002201619653002401641653003401665653001101699653002801710100001901738700002101757700001901778700001701797700002001814700002401834856004801858 2008 eng d00aThree cases of feature correlation in an electrocorticographic BCI.0 aThree cases of feature correlation in an electrocorticographic B aVancouver, BCbIEEEc08/20083 aThree human subjects participated in a closed-loop brain computer interface cursor control experiment mediated by implanted subdural electrocorticographic arrays. The paradigm consisted of several stages: baseline recording, hand and tongue motor tasks as the basis for feature selection, two closed-loop one-dimensional feedback experiments with each of these features, and a two-dimensional feedback experiment using both of the features simultaneously. The two selected features were simple channel and frequency band combinations associated with change during hand and tongue movement. Inter-feature correlation and cross-correlation between features during different epochs of each task were quantified for each stage of the experiment. Our anecdotal, three subject, result suggests that while high correlation between horizontal and vertical control signal can initially preclude successful two-dimensional cursor control, a feedback-based learning strategy can be successfully employed by the subject to overcome this limitation and progressively decorrelate these control signals.10aAdolescent10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aautomated pattern recognition10acontrol systems10adecorrelation10aElectrocardiography10aElectrodes10aElectroencephalography10aevoked motor potentials10aFeedback10aFemale10afrequency10ahospitals10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Cortex10aSignal Processing10aStatistics as Topic10aTask Performance and Analysis10aTongue10aUser-Computer Interface1 aMiller, Kai, J1 aBlakely, Timothy1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aNijs, Marcel1 aRao, Rajesh, PN1 aOjemann, Jeffrey, G uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1916391802708nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245010900055210006900164260001200233300001100245490000600256520162400262653002201886653001201908653001001920653001801930653002501948653001501973653002901988653000902017653002402026653001702050653001202067653000902079653002502088653004102113653002602154100001602180700002302196700001902219700002802238700002002266856004802286 2006 eng d a1557-170X00aAnalysis of the correlation between local field potentials and neuronal firing rate in the motor cortex.0 aAnalysis of the correlation between local field potentials and n c09/2006 a6185-80 v13 a

Neuronal firing rate has been the signal of choice for invasive motor brain machine interfaces (BMI). The use of local field potentials (LFP) in BMI experiments may provide additional dendritic information about movement intent and may improve performance. Here we study the time-varying amplitude modulated relationship between local field potentials (LFP) and single unit activity (SUA) in the motor cortex. We record LFP and SUA in the primary motor cortex of rats trained to perform a lever pressing task, and evaluate the correlation between pairs of peri-event time histograms (PETH) and movement evoked local field potentials (mEP) at the same electrode. Three different correlation coefficients were calculated and compared between the neuronal PETH and the magnitude and power of the mEP. Correlation as high as 0.7 for some neurons occurred between the PETH and the mEP magnitude. As expected, the correlations between the single trial LFP and SUV are much lower due to the inherent variability of both signals.

10aAction Potentials10aAnimals10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aElectric Stimulation10aElectrodes10aEvoked Potentials, Motor10aMale10aModels, Statistical10aMotor Cortex10aNeurons10aRats10aRats, Sprague-Dawley10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aSynaptic Transmission1 aWang, Yiwen1 aSanchez, Justin, C1 aPrincipe, Jose1 aMitzelfelt, Jeremiah, D1 aGunduz, Aysegul uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17946745