02595nas a2200421   4500008004100000022001400041245009200055210006900147260001200216300001100228490000700239520137400246653001001620653000901630653003401639653002801673653003001701653002801731653002701759653003501786653001101821653001101832653000901843653001601852653001901868653002301887653002801910653001801938100002001956700002101976700002601997700001902023700001902042700001902061700002102080700002402101856004802125       2014                        eng d  a2167-922300aBrain-computer interface (BCI) evaluation in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.0 aBraincomputer interface BCI evaluation in people with amyotrophi  c06/2014  a207-150 v153 aBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs) might restore communication to people severely disabled by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or other disorders. We sought to: 1) define a protocol for determining whether a person with ALS can use a visual P300-based BCI; 2) determine what proportion of this population can use the BCI; and 3) identify factors affecting BCI performance. Twenty-five individuals with ALS completed an evaluation protocol using a standard 6 × 6 matrix and parameters selected by stepwise linear discrimination. With an 8-channel EEG montage, the subjects fell into two groups in BCI accuracy (chance accuracy 3%). Seventeen averaged 92 (± 3)% (range 71-100%), which is adequate for communication (G70 group). Eight averaged 12 (± 6)% (range 0-36%), inadequate for communication (L40 subject group). Performance did not correlate with disability: 11/17 (65%) of G70 subjects were severely disabled (i.e. ALSFRS-R < 5). All L40 subjects had visual impairments (e.g. nystagmus, diplopia, ptosis). P300 was larger and more anterior in G70 subjects. A 16-channel montage did not significantly improve accuracy. In conclusion, most people severely disabled by ALS could use a visual P300-based BCI for communication. In those who could not, visual impairment was the principal obstacle. For these individuals, auditory P300-based BCIs might be effective.10aAdult10aAged10aAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis10aBiofeedback, Psychology10abrain-computer interfaces10aCommunication Disorders10aElectroencephalography10aEvent-Related Potentials, P30010aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aOnline Systems10aPhotic Stimulation10aPsychomotor Performance10aReaction Time1 aMcCane, Lynn, M1 aSellers, Eric, W1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aMak, Joseph, N1 aCarmack, Steve1 aZeitlin, Debra1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aVaughan, Theresa, M  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2455584302830nas a2200337   4500008004100000022001400041245004900055210004500104260001200149300001100161490000600172520196200178653001002140653003502150653001802185653001102203653001102214653000902225653001602234653002502250653002302275653002802298653001602326100001902342700001302361700001502374700002102389700001502410700001902425856004802444       2010                        eng d  a1741-255200aDoes the 'P300' speller depend on eye gaze?.0 aDoes the P300 speller depend on eye gaze  c10/2010  a0560130 v73 a<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;">Many people affected by debilitating neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem stroke or spinal cord injury are impaired in their ability to, or are even unable to, communicate. A brain-computer interface (BCI) uses brain signals, rather than muscles, to re-establish communication with the outside world. One particular BCI approach is the so-called 'P300 matrix speller' that was first described by Farwell and Donchin (1988 Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 510-23). It has been widely assumed that this method does not depend on the ability to focus on the desired character, because it was thought that it relies primarily on the P300-evoked potential and minimally, if at all, on other EEG features such as the visual-evoked potential (VEP). This issue is highly relevant for the clinical application of this BCI method, because eye movements may be impaired or lost in the relevant user population. This study investigated the extent to which the performance in a 'P300' speller BCI depends on eye gaze. We evaluated the performance of 17 healthy subjects using a 'P300' matrix speller under two conditions. Under one condition ('letter'), the subjects focused their eye gaze on the intended letter, while under the second condition ('center'), the subjects focused their eye gaze on a fixation cross that was located in the center of the matrix. The results show that the performance of the 'P300' matrix speller in normal subjects depends in considerable measure on gaze direction. They thereby disprove a widespread assumption in BCI research, and suggest that this BCI might function more effectively for people who retain some eye-movement control. The applicability of these findings to people with severe neuromuscular disabilities (particularly in eye-movements) remains to be determined.</span></p>10aAdult10aEvent-Related Potentials, P30010aEye Movements10aFemale10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aModels, Neurological10aPhotic Stimulation10aUser-Computer Interface10aYoung Adult1 aBrunner, Peter1 aJoshi, S1 aBriskin, S1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aBischof, H1 aSchalk, Gerwin  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2085892401758nas a2200361   4500008004100000022001400041245012300055210006900178260001200247300001100259490000600270520064200276653001500918653001000933653001400943653002400957653002700981653003501008653001101043653002501054653003501079653002301114653001401137653004101151653003401192653002801226653001201254100001901266700002501285700002001310700001801330856004801348       2009                        eng d  a1741-255200aOverlap and refractory effects in a brain-computer interface speller based on the visual P300 event-related potential.0 aOverlap and refractory effects in a braincomputer interface spel  c04/2009  a0260030 v63 a<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;">We reveal the presence of refractory and overlap effects in the event-related potentials in visual P300 speller datasets, and we show their negative impact on the performance of the system. This finding has important implications for how to encode the letters that can be selected for communication. However, we show that such effects are dependent on stimulus parameters: an alternative stimulus type based on apparent motion suffers less from the refractory effects and leads to an improved letter prediction performance.</span></p>10aAlgorithms10aBrain10aCognition10aComputer Simulation10aElectroencephalography10aEvent-Related Potentials, P30010aHumans10aModels, Neurological10aPattern Recognition, Automated10aPhotic Stimulation10aSemantics10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aTask Performance and Analysis10aUser-Computer Interface10aWriting1 aMartens, S M M1 aHill, Jeremy, Jeremy1 aFarquhar, Jason1 aSchölkopf, B  uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19255462