02352nas a2200445 4500008004100000245007200041210006900113260003300182520109300215653001501308653001001323653001501333653003401348653002001382653001801402653002401420653001501444653002701459653002801486653001301514653001101527653001401538653001401552653001101566653000901577653001601586653001701602653002201619653002401641653003401665653001101699653002801710100001901738700002101757700001901778700001701797700002001814700002401834856004801858 2008 eng d00aThree cases of feature correlation in an electrocorticographic BCI.0 aThree cases of feature correlation in an electrocorticographic B aVancouver, BCbIEEEc08/20083 aThree human subjects participated in a closed-loop brain computer interface cursor control experiment mediated by implanted subdural electrocorticographic arrays. The paradigm consisted of several stages: baseline recording, hand and tongue motor tasks as the basis for feature selection, two closed-loop one-dimensional feedback experiments with each of these features, and a two-dimensional feedback experiment using both of the features simultaneously. The two selected features were simple channel and frequency band combinations associated with change during hand and tongue movement. Inter-feature correlation and cross-correlation between features during different epochs of each task were quantified for each stage of the experiment. Our anecdotal, three subject, result suggests that while high correlation between horizontal and vertical control signal can initially preclude successful two-dimensional cursor control, a feedback-based learning strategy can be successfully employed by the subject to overcome this limitation and progressively decorrelate these control signals.10aAdolescent10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aautomated pattern recognition10acontrol systems10adecorrelation10aElectrocardiography10aElectrodes10aElectroencephalography10aevoked motor potentials10aFeedback10aFemale10afrequency10ahospitals10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Cortex10aSignal Processing10aStatistics as Topic10aTask Performance and Analysis10aTongue10aUser-Computer Interface1 aMiller, Kai, J1 aBlakely, Timothy1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aNijs, Marcel1 aRao, Rajesh, PN1 aOjemann, Jeffrey, G uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1916391803540nas a2200457 4500008004100000022001400041245004900055210004100104260001200145300001100157490000700168520234400175653001002519653001502529653001402544653001002558653002702568653002702595653002102622653001302643653001102656653000902667653000902676653001902685653001102704653003102715653002702746653000902773653001302782653003302795653004102828653002802869100002302897700001902920700002102939700002002960700001802980700002102998700001503019856004803034 2007 eng d a1053-811900aAn MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI).0 aMEGbased braincomputer interface BCI c07/2007 a581-930 v363 a

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) allow for communicating intentions by mere brain activity, not involving muscles. Thus, BCIs may offer patients who have lost all voluntary muscle control the only possible way to communicate. Many recent studies have demonstrated that BCIs based on electroencephalography(EEG) can allow healthy and severely paralyzed individuals to communicate. While this approach is safe and inexpensive, communication is slow. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides signals with higher spatiotemporal resolution than EEG and could thus be used to explore whether these improved signal properties translate into increased BCI communication speed. In this study, we investigated the utility of an MEG-based BCI that uses voluntary amplitude modulation of sensorimotor mu and beta rhythms. To increase the signal-to-noise ratio, we present a simple spatial filtering method that takes the geometric properties of signal propagation in MEG into account, and we present methods that can process artifacts specifically encountered in an MEG-based BCI. Exemplarily, six participants were successfully trained to communicate binary decisions by imagery of limb movements using a feedback paradigm. Participants achieved significant mu rhythm self control within 32 min of feedback training. For a subgroup of three participants, we localized the origin of the amplitude modulated signal to the motor cortex. Our results suggest that an MEG-based BCI is feasible and efficient in terms of user training.

10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aArtifacts10aBrain10aElectroencephalography10aElectromagnetic Fields10aElectromyography10aFeedback10aFemale10aFoot10aHand10aHead Movements10aHumans10aMagnetic Resonance Imaging10aMagnetoencephalography10aMale10aMovement10aPrincipal Component Analysis10aSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted10aUser-Computer Interface1 aMellinger, Jürgen1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aBraun, Christoph1 aPreissl, Hubert1 aRosenstiel, W1 aBirbaumer, Niels1 aKübler, A uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1747551102353nas a2200229 4500008004100000022001400041245008900055210006900144260001200213300001400225490000700239520162900246653003101875653003501906653002701941653001301968100002301981700002602004700002102030700002402051856004802075 2004 eng d a1534-432000aConversion of EEG activity into cursor movement by a brain-computer interface (BCI).0 aConversion of EEG activity into cursor movement by a braincomput c09/2004 a331–3380 v123 aThe Wadsworth electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) uses amplitude in mu or beta frequency bands over sensorimotor cortex to control cursor movement. Trained users can move the cursor in one or two dimensions. The primary goal of this research is to provide a new communication and control option for people with severe motor disabilities. Currently, cursor movements in each dimension are determined 10 times/s by an empirically derived linear function of one or two EEG features (i.e., spectral bands from different electrode locations). This study used offline analysis of data collected during system operation to explore methods for improving the accuracy of cursor movement. The data were gathered while users selected among three possible targets by controlling vertical [i.e., one-dimensional (1-D)] cursor movement. The three methods analyzed differ in the dimensionality of the cursor movement [1-D versus two-dimensional (2-D)] and in the type of the underlying function (linear versus nonlinear). We addressed two questions: Which method is best for classification (i.e., to determine from the EEG which target the user wants to hit)? How does the number of EEG features affect the performance of each method? All methods reached their optimal performance with 10-20 features. In offline simulation, the 2-D linear method and the 1-D nonlinear method improved performance significantly over the 1-D linear method. The 1-D linear method did not do so. These offline results suggest that the 1-D nonlinear or the 2-D linear cursor function will improve online operation of the BCI system.10aaugmentative communication10aBrain-computer interface (BCI)10aElectroencephalography10aFeedback1 aFabiani, Georg, E.1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aPfurtscheller, Gert uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1547319503064nas a2200373 4500008004100000022001400041245009000055210006900145260001200214300001000226490000700236520200500243653002902248653001002277653001502287653001402302653001002316653001802326653002702344653003002371653001302401653001102414653001602425653002802441653001302469653002002482653002802502653002202530100002102552700002602573700002402599700001902623856004802642 2003 eng d a1534-432000aThe Wadsworth Center brain-computer interface (BCI) research and development program.0 aWadsworth Center braincomputer interface BCI research and develo c06/2003 a204-70 v113 a

Brain-computer interface (BCI) research at the Wadsworth Center has focused primarily on using electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythms recorded from the scalp over sensorimotor cortex to control cursor movement in one or two dimensions. Recent and current studies seek to improve the speed and accuracy of this control by improving the selection of signal features and their translation into device commands, by incorporating additional signal features, and by optimizing the adaptive interaction between the user and system. In addition, to facilitate the evaluation, comparison, and combination of alternative BCI methods, we have developed a general-purpose BCI system called BCI-2000 and have made it available to other research groups. Finally, in collaboration with several other groups, we are developing simple BCI applications and are testing their practicality and long-term value for people with severe motor disabilities.

10aAcademic Medical Centers10aAdult10aAlgorithms10aArtifacts10aBrain10aBrain Mapping10aElectroencephalography10aEvoked Potentials, Visual10aFeedback10aHumans10aMiddle Aged10aNervous System Diseases10aResearch10aResearch Design10aUser-Computer Interface10aVisual Perception1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aMcFarland, Dennis, J.1 aVaughan, Theresa, M1 aSchalk, Gerwin uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12899275