03372nas a2200409 4500008004100000022001400041245011600055210006900171260001300240300001000253490000700263520216200270653001002432653000902442653003002451653002002481653002702501653001102528653001702539653001102556653000902567653001602576653001902592653001202611653002402623653002502647653001102672653002602683653001702709653002002726100001902746700002002765700002002785700002202805700002302827856011202850 2025 eng d a1552-684400aIpsiHand Brain-Computer Interface Therapy Induces Broad Upper Extremity Motor Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke.0 aIpsiHand BrainComputer Interface Therapy Induces Broad Upper Ext c2025 Jan a74-860 v393 a

BACKGROUND: Chronic hemiparetic stroke patients have very limited benefits from current therapies. Brain-computer interface (BCI) engaging the unaffected hemisphere has emerged as a promising novel therapeutic approach for chronic stroke rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effectiveness of contralesionally-controlled BCI therapy in chronic stroke patients with impaired upper extremity motor function. We further explored neurophysiological features of motor recovery driven by BCI. We hypothesized that BCI therapy would induce a broad motor recovery in the upper extremity, and there would be corresponding changes in baseline theta and gamma oscillations, which have been shown to be associated with motor recovery.

METHODS: Twenty-six prospectively enrolled chronic hemiparetic stroke patients performed a therapeutic BCI task for 12 weeks. Motor function assessment data and resting state electroencephalogram signals were acquired before initiating BCI therapy and across BCI therapy sessions. The Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment served as a primary motor outcome assessment tool. Theta-gamma cross-frequency coupling (CFC) was computed and correlated with motor recovery.

RESULTS: Chronic stroke patients achieved significant motor improvement in both proximal and distal upper extremity with BCI therapy. Motor function improvement was independent of Botox application. Theta-gamma CFC enhanced bilaterally over the C3/C4 motor electrodes and positively correlated with motor recovery across BCI therapy sessions.

CONCLUSIONS: BCI therapy resulted in significant motor function improvement across the proximal and distal upper extremities of patients, which significantly correlated with theta-gamma CFC increases in the motor regions. This may represent rhythm-specific cortical oscillatory mechanism for BCI-driven rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Advarra Study: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04338971 and Washington University Study: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03611855.

10aAdult10aAged10abrain-computer interfaces10aChronic Disease10aElectroencephalography10aFemale10aGamma Rhythm10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Activity10aParesis10aProspective Studies10aRecovery of Function10aStroke10aStroke Rehabilitation10aTheta Rhythm10aUpper Extremity1 aRustamov, Nabi1 aSouders, Lauren1 aSheehan, Lauren1 aCarter, Alexandre1 aLeuthardt, Eric, C uhttps://neurotechcenter.org/publications/2025/ipsihand-brain-computer-interface-therapy-induces-broad-upper02706nas a2200265 4500008004100000245009100041210006900132260001200201490000700213520195600220653000802176653001802184653001902202653001002221653002402231653001102255100001502266700001802281700001302299700001502312700001802327700002102345700002202366856005202388 2018 eng d00aControlling pre-movement sensorimotor rhythm can improve finger extension after stroke0 aControlling premovement sensorimotor rhythm can improve finger e c08/20180 v153 aObjective. Brain–computer interface (BCI) technology is attracting increasing interest as a tool for enhancing recovery of motor function after stroke, yet the optimal way to apply this technology is unknown. Here, we studied the immediate and therapeutic effects of BCI-based training to control pre-movement sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) amplitude on robot-assisted finger extension in people with stroke. Approach. Eight people with moderate to severe hand impairment due to chronic stroke completed a four-week three-phase protocol during which they practiced finger extension with assistance from the FINGER robotic exoskeleton. In Phase 1, we identified spatiospectral SMR features for each person that correlated with the intent to extend the index and/or middle finger(s). In Phase 2, the participants learned to increase or decrease SMR features given visual feedback, without movement. In Phase 3, the participants were cued to increase or decrease their SMR features, and when successful, were then cued to immediately attempt to extend the finger(s) with robot assistance. Main results. Of the four participants that achieved SMR control in Phase 2, three initiated finger extensions with a reduced reaction time after decreasing (versus increasing) pre-movement SMR amplitude during Phase 3. Two also extended at least one of their fingers more forcefully after decreasing pre-movement SMR amplitude. Hand function, measured by the box and block test (BBT), improved by 7.3  ±  7.5 blocks versus 3.5  ±  3.1 blocks in those with and without SMR control, respectively. Higher BBT scores at baseline correlated with a larger change in BBT score. Significance. These results suggest that learning to control person-specific pre-movement SMR features associated with finger extension can improve finger extension ability after stroke for some individuals. These results merit further investigation in a rehabilitation context.10aBCI10aMotor control10aRehabilitation10arobot10asensorimotor rhythm10aStroke1 aNorman, SL1 aMcFarland, DJ1 aMiner, A1 aCramer, SC1 aWolbrecht, ET1 aWolpaw, Jonathan1 aReinkensmeyer, DJ uhttp://stacks.iop.org/1741-2552/15/i=5/a=05602604121nas a2200457 4500008004100000022001400041245010800055210006900163260001200232300001100244490000700255520290000262653001503162653001003177653002103187653001203208653001803220653001003238653002403248653002703272653001103299653000903310653001103319653000903330653001603339653001703355653001303372653001203385653002203397653002803419653001103447653002803458653001303486100002303499700002603522700001903548700001603567700001303583700001903596856004803615 2008 eng d a1524-462800aUnique cortical physiology associated with ipsilateral hand movements and neuroprosthetic implications.0 aUnique cortical physiology associated with ipsilateral hand move c12/2008 a3351-90 v393 a

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 

Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) offer little direct benefit to patients with hemispheric stroke because current platforms rely on signals derived from the contralateral motor cortex (the same region injured by the stroke). For BCIs to assist hemiparetic patients, the implant must use unaffected cortex ipsilateral to the affected limb. This requires the identification of distinct electrophysiological features from the motor cortex associated with ipsilateral hand movements.

METHODS: 

In this study we studied 6 patients undergoing temporary placement of intracranial electrode arrays. Electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals were recorded while the subjects engaged in specific ipsilateral or contralateral hand motor tasks. Spectral changes were identified with regards to frequency, location, and timing.

RESULTS: 

Ipsilateral hand movements were associated with electrophysiological changes that occur in lower frequency spectra, at distinct anatomic locations, and earlier than changes associated with contralateral hand movements. In a subset of 3 patients, features specific to ipsilateral and contralateral hand movements were used to control a cursor on a screen in real time. In ipsilateral derived control this was optimal with lower frequency spectra.

CONCLUSIONS: 

There are distinctive cortical electrophysiological features associated with ipsilateral movements which can be used for device control. These findings have implications for patients with hemispheric stroke because they offer a potential methodology for which a single hemisphere can be used to enhance the function of a stroke induced hemiparesis.

10aAdolescent10aAdult10aArtificial Limbs10aBionics10aBrain Mapping10aChild10aDominance, Cerebral10aElectroencephalography10aFemale10aHand10aHumans10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMotor Cortex10aMovement10aParesis10aProsthesis Design10aPsychomotor Performance10aStroke10aUser-Computer Interface10aVolition1 aWisneski, Kimberly1 aAnderson, Nicholas, R1 aSchalk, Gerwin1 aSmyth, Matt1 aMoran, D1 aLeuthardt, E C uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1892745601471nas a2200325 4500008004100000022001400041245006200055210005900117260001200176300001400188490000600202520059000208653000800798653002800806653000800834653000800842653002600850653002900876653002800905653000800933653000800941653002300949653002800972653001001000653001101010100002501021700003001046700002101076856004801097 2007 eng d a1743-444000aBrain-computer interface systems: progress and prospects.0 aBraincomputer interface systems progress and prospects c07/2007 a463–4740 v43 aBrain-computer interface (BCI) systems support communication through direct measures of neural activity without muscle activity. BCIs may provide the best and sometimes the only communication option for users disabled by the most severe neuromuscular disorders and may eventually become useful to less severely disabled and/or healthy individuals across a wide range of applications. This review discusses the structure and functions of BCI systems, clarifies terminology and addresses practical applications. Progress and opportunities in the field are also identified and explicated.10aALS10aassistive communication10aBCI10aBMI10abrain-acuated control10abrain-computer interface10abrain-machine interface10aEEG10aERP10alocked-in syndrome10aslow cortical potential10aSSVEP10aStroke1 aAllison, Brendan, Z.1 aWolpaw, Elizabeth, Winter1 aWolpaw, Jonathan uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17605682