<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jonathan Wolpaw</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">E. Winter-Wolpaw</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gerwin Schalk</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BCIs That Use Electrocorticographic Activity.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">brain signals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">brain-computer interfaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ECoG</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intracortically recorded signals</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388855.001.0001/acprof-9780195388855-chapter-015</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oxford University Press</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This chapter discusses the potential of electrocorticography (ECoG) as a clinically useful brain-computer interface signal modality. ECoG has greater amplitude, higher topographical resolution, and a much broader frequency range than scalp-recorded electroencephalography and is less susceptible to artifacts. With current and foreseeable recording methodologies, ECoG is likely to have greater long-term stability than intracortically recorded signals. Furthermore, it can more readily be recorded from larger cortical areas, and it requires much lower digitization rates, thus greatly reducing the power requirements of wholly implanted systems.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nicholas R Anderson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blakely, Timothy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gerwin Schalk</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leuthardt, E C</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moran, Daniel W</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Correlates of Human Arm Movements.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Exp Brain Res</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Exp Brain Res</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">arm tuning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">brain-computer interfaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cosine tuning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Electrocorticography</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Motor Cortex</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">subdural electroencephalography</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23001369</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">223</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-10</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Invasive and non-invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) studies have long focused on the motor cortex for kinematic control of artificial devices. Most of these studies have used single-neuron recordings or electroencephalography (EEG). Electrocorticography (ECoG) is a relatively new recording modality in BCI research that has primarily been built on successes in EEG recordings. We built on prior experiments related to single-neuron recording and quantitatively compare the extent to which different brain regions reflect kinematic tuning parameters of hand speed, direction, and velocity in both a reaching and tracing task in humans. Hand and arm movement experiments using ECoG have shown positive results before, but the tasks were not designed to tease out which kinematics are encoded. In non-human primates, the relationships among these kinematics have been more carefully documented, and we sought to begin elucidating that relationship in humans using ECoG. The largest modulation in ECoG activity for direction, speed, and velocity representation was found in the primary motor cortex. We also found consistent cosine tuning across both tasks, to hand direction and velocity in the high gamma band (70-160 Hz). Thus, the results of this study clarify the neural substrates involved in encoding aspects of motor preparation and execution and confirm the important role of the motor cortex in BCI applications.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record></records></xml>