Anatomical registration of intracranial electrodes. Robust model-based localization and deformable smooth brain-shift compensation methods.

TitleAnatomical registration of intracranial electrodes. Robust model-based localization and deformable smooth brain-shift compensation methods.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2024
AuthorsBlenkmann, AOmar, Leske, SLiliana, Llorens, A, Lin, JJ, Chang, EF, Brunner, P, Schalk, G, Ivanovic, J, Larsson, PGunnar, Knight, RThomas, Endestad, T, Solbakk, A-K
JournalJ Neurosci Methods
Volume404
Pagination110056
Date Published2024 Apr
ISSN1872-678X
KeywordsBrain, Cerebral Cortex, Electrodes, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracranial electrodes are typically localized from post-implantation CT artifacts. Automatic algorithms localizing low signal-to-noise ratio artifacts and high-density electrode arrays are missing. Additionally, implantation of grids/strips introduces brain deformations, resulting in registration errors when fusing post-implantation CT and pre-implantation MR images. Brain-shift compensation methods project electrode coordinates to cortex, but either fail to produce smooth solutions or do not account for brain deformations.

NEW METHODS: We first introduce GridFit, a model-based fitting approach that simultaneously localizes all electrodes' CT artifacts in grids, strips, or depth arrays. Second, we present CEPA, a brain-shift compensation algorithm combining orthogonal-based projections, spring-mesh models, and spatial regularization constraints.

RESULTS: We tested GridFit on ∼6000 simulated scenarios. The localization of CT artifacts showed robust performance under difficult scenarios, such as noise, overlaps, and high-density implants (

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: GridFit succeeded in difficult scenarios that challenged available methods and outperformed visual localization by preserving the inter-electrode distance. CEPA registration errors were smaller than those obtained for well-established alternatives. Additionally, modeling resting-state high-frequency activity in five patients further supported CEPA.

CONCLUSION: GridFit and CEPA are versatile tools for registering intracranial electrode coordinates, providing highly accurate results even in the most challenging implantation scenarios. The methods are implemented in the iElectrodes open-source toolbox.

DOI10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110056
Alternate JournalJ Neurosci Methods
PubMed ID38224783
Grant ListU01 NS108916 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
U19 NS107609 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R01 EB026439 / EB / NIBIB NIH HHS / United States
P41 EB018783 / EB / NIBIB NIH HHS / United States
R37 NS021135 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
U24 NS109103 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
P50 MH109429 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States

You are here